Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 1293 Del
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2020
$~53
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 26.02.2020
+ CRL.M.C. 1071/2020
RAJPAL SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through Ms.Jyoti Verma, Adv.
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through Mr.Izhar Ahmed, APP for State.
SI Dharmvir Singh CWC Nanak Pura.
Mr.Lakshay Anand, Adv. with
Mr.Aryan Arora, Adv. for R-2 with
R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Crl. M.A. 4254/2020
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.1071/2020
3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of
FIR No.171/2012 dated 11.12.2012 registered at Police Station Crime
Women Cell and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for
respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition
is taken up for final disposal.
6. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 26.03.2000 as per
Hindu rites and rituals. One male child was born out of the wedlock namely
Jaskirat Singh. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners and
respondent no.2, they started living separately since July 2011.
7. Petitioners and respondent no.2, with the intervention of their well
wishers and relatives, have entered into an amicable settlement vide
compromise-cum-settlement deed dated 10.07.2019 and settled all their
disputes amicably.
8. The total settlement amount is ₹25,00,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five
Lakhs only). It is submitted that the respondent no. 2 has already received an
amount of ₹16,50,000/- (Rupees Sixteen Lacs Fifty Thousand only). Two
demand drafts bearing Nos.513556 dated 18.02.2020 for ₹4,00,000/- &
516158 dated 05.12.2019 for ₹4,50,000/- (Total Rupees Eight Lacs Fifty
Thousand only) is handed over to the respondent no. 2 today in the Court.
9. Complainant/Respondent no.2 is present in person and has been
identified by SI Dharamvir Singh/IO and submits that matter has been
settled, therefore, she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any
further.
11. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.171/2012 dated 11.12.2012
registered at Police Station Crime Women Cell and consequent proceedings
emanating therefrom are quashed.
12. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.
13. Order dasti.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE FEBRUARY 26, 2020 ab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!