Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 1201 Del
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2020
$~64
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision:20.02 .2020
+ CRL.M.C. 966/2020
DEEPAK MALHOTRA & ORS .... Petitioners
Through Ms.Diksha Mathur and Mr.Mohit
Bangwal, proxy counsel
versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NT OF DELHI) & ANR .... Respondents
Through Mr.Izhar Ahmed, APP for State with
SI Jeetendra Singh, PS Bharat Nagar,
Delhi
R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
1. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of
F.I.R No.0342 dated 30.06.2015 registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar,
Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Notice issued.
3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2
present in person and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition
is taken up for final disposal.
4. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 20.9.2010 as per
Hindu rites and rituals. One male child was born out of the wedlock, namely
Hardik. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners and respondent
no.2, they started living separately from 30.12.2014.
5. Petitioner No.1 and respondent no.2 entered into an amicable
settlement before the Counselling Cell, Family Courts, (North-West),
Rohini, Delhi vide settlement deed dated 4.2.2019 and settled all their
disputes amicably.
6. Respondent No.2 is present in person and has been identified by SI
Jeetendra Singh (IO) and submits that matter has been settled and she does
not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
7. It is agreed between petitioner and respondent No.2 that petitioner
shall pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- per month towards expenses of child and
respondent No.2 subject to condition that petitioner should be allowed to
meet the child every week on Sunday. Respondent No.2 has agreed thereto.
8. Accordingly, petitioner shall pay Rs.10,000/- month to respondent
No.2 for expenses of child and respondent No.2. Petitioner shall meet child
for three hours on every Sunday, i.e. from 11 AM to 2 PM.
9. It is made clear that child shall be taken from residence of respondent
No.2 at 11 AM and shall be dropped at the same place at 2 PM.
10. It is also made clear that if either party fails to comply with terms of
aforesaid settlement before this Court, the said party shall be liable for legal
action.
11. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any
further.
12. For the reasons afore-recorded, F.I.R No.0342 dated 30.06.2015
registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar, Delhi and consequent proceedings
emanating therefrom are quashed.
13. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.
14. Order dasti.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE FEBRUARY 20, 2020/rk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!