Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 3373 Del
Judgement Date : 9 December, 2020
$~5.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Decided on: 9th December, 2020
+ W.P.(C) 9225/2020
ALL INDIA RADIO CASUAL ANNOUNCER
AND COMPERES UNION & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr.Akash Vashishtha, Adv. with
Mr.Munish Choker, Adv.
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms.Monika Arora, CGSC
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
JUDGMENT
: D.N.PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral)
Proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video
conferencing.
C.M.No.29757/2020 (exemptions)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) No.9225/2020
1. This public interest litigation is preferred with the following prayers:-
"A. Directing the Respondents to resume all channels/
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PANKAJ KUMAR Location:
Signing Date:14.12.2020 20:14:56 stations/services/units of AIR mentioned in Para 38 of the present petition and those closed/stopped/discontinued during the COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing lockdown, with immediate effect.
B. Directing the Respondents to restart the Regional Academies of Broadcasting & Multimedia situated at Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, Lucknow, Shillong and Thiruvananthapuram.
C. Quashing the Order of Respondent No.2, dated 03.01.2019.
D. Directing the Respondents to compensate all the contractual casual Announcers/ Radio Jockeys/ Presenters/ Comperes serving in AIR's stations/channels mentioned in Para 38 of this petition, and those closed in the past six months, for the loss of work and wages they suffered since the closure of their channels/stations/services/units. E. Any other writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court pleases be passed in favour of the Petitioners."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that several
representations have been preferred by the petitioners before the concerned
respondent authorities (Annexure P-7 to the memo of this writ petition) and
these representations have not been decided by the respondent authorities.
3. It is, therefore, submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that it
will suffice for the disposal of the writ petition, if the same is directed to be
treated as a representation by the concerned respondent authorities.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PANKAJ KUMAR Location:
Signing Date:14.12.2020 20:14:56
4. We accordingly direct the concerned respondent authorities to treat
this writ petition as a representation and decide the same in accordance with
law, rules, regulations and Government policies applicable to the facts of the
case, as expeditiously as possible and practicable.
5. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
PRATEEK JALAN, J DECEMBER 09, 2020 'anb'
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PANKAJ KUMAR Location:
Signing Date:14.12.2020 20:14:56
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!