Rajesh Sharma vs South Delhi Municipal ...
2020 Latest Caselaw 2511 Del

                                      $~6
                                      *       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                      %                           Judgment delivered on:    27thAugust, 2020

                                      +       CONT.CAS(C) 471/2020& CM APPLN. 20619/2020
                                      RAJESH SHARMA                                        ..... Petitioner
                                                                         versus

                                      SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
                                      & ORS.                            ..... Respondents

                                      Advocates who appeared in this case:
                                      For the Petitioner:   Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate

                                      For the Respondents: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing Counsel for R-1/SDMC with
                                                           Ms. Ankita Bhadouriya, Advocate
                                                           Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for R-2/DDA

                                      CORAM:-
                                      HON'BLE MR JUSTICESANJEEV SACHDEVA

                                                                     JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2. Petitioner seeks initiation of proceedings against respondents for non-compliance of order dated 23.12.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 13629/2019.

3. By order dated 23.12.2019, respondent no. 1-South Delhi Municipal Corporation was directed to carry out an inspection of the subject premises and take action as per law, if required and also

Signature Not Verified

MAGGU Signing Date:27.08.2020 19:08:30 This file is digitally signed by PS to HMJ Sanjeev Sachdeva.

intimate the petitioner about the steps taken.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent on advance notice that by letter dated 19.02.2020 petitioner was informed that the property had been inspected and certain deviations were found. He submits that since the Building Plan had been approved, the owner of the property was directed to comply with the same.

5. Learned counsel under instructions submits that today the building stands complete. The compoundable deviations have been compounded and non-compoundable deviations have been removed. A Completion certificate has been issued on 13.05.2020.

6. Learned counsel further submits that today no further action is contemplated against the said property because there are no deviations and the building has been constructed in accordance with the sanction plan.

7. The statement is taken on record.

8. Learned counsel submits that a communication to the said effect was issued to the petitioner on 10.07.2020.

9. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not received any communicated dated 10.07.2020.

10. Respondents are directed to furnish a copy of letter dated

Signature Not Verified

MAGGU Signing Date:27.08.2020 19:08:30 This file is digitally signed by PS to HMJ Sanjeev Sachdeva.

10.07.2020 to the petitioner within three days from today.

11. In view of the above, no further order is called for in the Contempt Petition and no ground is made out for initiating any proceedings against the respondents.

12. The petition is accordingly disposed of.

13. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J AUGUST 27, 2020 'rs'

Signature Not Verified

MAGGU Signing Date:27.08.2020 19:08:30 This file is digitally signed by PS to HMJ Sanjeev Sachdeva.