Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 4721 Del
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2019
$~61
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 30.09.2019
+ CRL.M.C. 4965/2019
JAIKARAN & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Krishan Sharma, Adv. with
Petitioner No. 1 in person
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State with
ASI Jitender Singh, PS - Kanjhawala
Mr. Vimal Puggal, Adv. for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
CRL. M.A. 37210/2019
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 4965/2019
3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.
464/2018 dated 19.11.2018 registered at PS - Kanjhawala and consequent
proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the
respondent no.2.
6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is
taken up for final disposal.
7. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 14.07.2013 as
per Hindu rites and rituals. Two children were born out of this wedlock,
namely, Pritam and Somiya. The difference reached to the extent that
respondent no. 2 on 19.11.2018 lodged FIR against the petitioners.
8. The petitioner and respondent no. 2 have entered into an amicable
settlement vide settlement deed dated 26.11.2018 and settled all their
disputes amicably. The parties have agreed to dissolve their marriage by
mutual consent in accordance with law, as provided under Section 13B of
HMA 1955. The total settlement amount is ₹5,50,000/-(Rupees Five Lakhs
Fifty Thousand). It is submitted that the respondent no. 2 has already
received an amount of ₹4 lakhs (Rupees Four Lakhs). A demand draft
bearing No.000863 dated 24.09.2019 for the balance amount of ₹1,50,000/-
(Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand) is handed over to the respondent no. 2
today in the Court.
9. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been
identified by ASI Jitendra Singh of Police Station - Kanjhawala and submits
that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter
any further.
10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the
petitioners any further.
11. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 464/2018 dated
19.11.2018 registered at PS - Kanjhawala and consequent proceedings
arising therefrom are quashed.
12. The petition is allowed accordingly.
13. Order dasti, under the signature of Court Master.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 PB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!