Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 4310 Del
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2019
$~65
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 13.09.2019
+ CRL.M.C. 4608/2019
SH. MOHIT GARG ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Adv.
with Mr.D.K. Pandey & Mr.Deepak
Kumar, Advs.
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through Mr.Izhar Ahmed, APP for State.
SI Sandeep Shrivastava, PS Shalimar
Bagh.
Mr.Ankit Kalra, Adv. with
Ms.Shivani Giri, Adv. for R-2 with R-
2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Crl.M.A.35737/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4608/2019
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby
quashing FIR No. 574/2014 dated 04.08.2014, registered at PS - Maurya
Enclave, for the offences punishable under Sections 323/341/354A/506/509
IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.
2. Notice issued.
3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the
respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the
present petition is taken up for final disposal.
4. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled
their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present
petition is allowed.
5. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court with her counsel and
she has been identified by SI Vishal Gupta /IO and submits that matter has
been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
6. The petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable
settlement before Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi vide
settlement deed dated 10.04.2017.
7. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the
petitioners any further.
8. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 574/2014 dated
04.08.2014, registered at PS - Maurya Enclave, for the offences punishable
under Sections 323/341/354A/506/509 IPC and consequent proceedings
therefrom are quashed.
9. The petition is allowed accordingly.
10. Order dasti, under the signature of Court Master.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE SEPTEMBER 13, 2019 ab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!