Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... vs Jyoti Devi & Ors
2019 Latest Caselaw 4191 Del

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 4191 Del
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2019

Delhi High Court
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... vs Jyoti Devi & Ors on 6 September, 2019
$~7
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%                                                 Decided on: 06.09.2019

+      MAC.APP. 930/2018 & CM APPL. 43271/2018
       BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant
                          Through:     Mr. A.K. Soni and Mr. Pavan Kumar,
                                       Advocates.

                          versus

       JYOTI DEVI & ORS                                  ..... Respondents
                     Through:          Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for R-1
                                       to R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

NAJMI WAZIRI, J. (Oral)

1. The award of compensation dated 05.07.2018 in Suit No. 2239/16 passed by the learned MACT has been impugned on the ground that the evidence of the witness who subsequently turned hostile, was not taken into consideration. The same has been dealt by the learned Tribunal as under:

"16. A perusal of cross examination of PW2 shows that he was not confronted with any of his previous statement by counsel for the insurance company. The cross-examination of this witness took place in this court on 14.12.2017. The judgment of acquittal relied upon by the insurance company is dated 16.11.2017. The insurance company ought to have confronted the witness with his previous statement to elicit his response to the same, and the same having not been

done, the insurance company can not take advantage of any such statement. So far as, acquittal of R1 in the said criminal proceedings is concerned, the same was done by giving benefit of doubt and as per settled law, acquittal in criminal case has no bearing on the compensation case as the standard of proof in both the proceedings are different (see Oriental Insurance Co. Vs. Shama Praveen MACA 774/14 decided on 22.04.2018)"

2. The sole ground for the appeal is bellied from the record.

3. There is no merit in the appeal. It is accordingly dismissed. The balance amount of the awarded compensation lying deposited in this Court, shall be released to the beneficiaries of the award alongwith interest accrued thereon in terms of the scheme of disbursement specified therein.

4. Statutory amount of Rs. 25,000/-, along with interest accrued thereon , shall be deposited into the "AASRA" Fund.

5. Copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for both the parties under the signature of the Court Master.

NAJMI WAZIRI, J SEPTEMBER 06, 2019 AB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter