Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashish Kumar @ Vicky vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi
2019 Latest Caselaw 5859 Del

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 5859 Del
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2019

Delhi High Court
Ashish Kumar @ Vicky vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 21 November, 2019
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                         Judgment delivered on: 21.11.2019
+      BAIL APPLN. 954/2019
       Ashish Kumar @ Vicky                           ..... Petitioner
                           Through:     Mr. Pawan Bahl, Advocate.
                           versus
       STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)                   ..... Respondent
                           Through      Mr. G. M. Farooqui,
                                        APP for State.
       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
                               JUDGMENT

BRIJESH SETHI, J.(oral)

1. Vide this order I shall dispose of a bail application filed u/s. 439

CrPC by the petitioner Ashish Kumar in FIR No. 181/2017 u/s.

302/307/34 IPC, P.S.Malviya Nagar.

2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has prayed for bail on the ground

that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated. It is

submitted that petitioner was not named in FIR by the prosecution and

he was arrested on the basis of suspicion on 08.06.2017 and since then

he is in jail. After completion of investigation, the police filed the

charge-sheet against the petitioner and two other accused persons

namely Robi Bahadur @ Ravi and Aman Sethi @ Golu @ Aman for

the alleged murder of Karan @ Aman. Nothing was recovered from

the petitioner during the investigation. It is submitted that prosecution

has so far examined PW-1 Amit Kumar on various dates and he also

been cross-examined by the Addl. PP. The petitioner has not been

identified by the alleged main eye-witness. Ld. ASJ vide order dated

03.10.2019 has dismissed the bail application moved by the petitioner.

It is submitted that Ld. ASJ has failed to appreciate that PW-1 has

clearly stated that he is not able to identify the petitioner Ashish @

Vicky. It is submitted that there is no other cogent evidence except the

witness Amit Kumar. It is, therefore, prayed that petitioner be released

on bail in the interest of justice.

3. Ld. APP for the state has opposed the bail application on the

ground that allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature. He

has, therefore prayed for dismissal of the bail application.

4. I have considered the rival submissions. According to

prosecution, on 05.05.2017, a PCR call vide DD No. 48-A regarding

murder was received at PS Malviya Nagar which was marked to SI

Suraj. SI Suraj along with staff reached at Flat No. E-12/43,, Hauz

Rani, Delhi. where it came to notice that injured persons had already

been taken to Max Hospital, Saket. One injured namely Karan @

Aman was declared brought dead by the doctors whereas another

injured Amit Kumar was admitted in the hospital. He was declared fit

for statement by the doctors. On enquiry, he stated that on 05.05.2017

at about 9.30 pm., he along with his friends namely Tajender @ Golu

& Karan @ Aman went to meet with their another friend Gaurav. At

about 10:45 PM, 4-5 persons namely Aman Sethi @ Golu, Robi,

Nikki, Akshu and Hemant along with stick canes and knives in their

hands, entered there. Aman Sethi @ Golu started attacking Karan @

Aman with Knife. On seeing this, he ran towards toilet to save

himself. He further stated that one stout bearded man attacked on his

face & shoulder with base ball stick. After that, Robi attacked him

with fist and kicks and also caught his hands. Akshu took knife from

Nikki and attacked on his legs. They ran away from there when he

shouted for help. After that, he went at upper floor of building for

help. He made call to Tajender @ Golu from there. On the statement

of injured/eye witness - Amit Kumar, a case vide FIR no. 181/2017

u/s 302/324/34 IPC was registered at PS Malviya Nagar.

5. The prosecution version is that on 7.05.2017, accused Robi

Bahadur @ Ravi was arrested and interrogated and he disclosed that

he and other co-accused are involved in the crime. During course of

investigation, it came on record that after committing the crime

accused Roby Bahadur got injured and with the help of his associates

he reached at Majidia Hospital. In Majidia Hospital accused Roby

Bahadur @ Ravi has given his details by mentioning the father name,

address and mobile number of petitioner Ashish. The SIM Card of the

mobile phone number 9999775820 was also found to be registered in

the name of petitioner Ashish. The CDR of mobile phone number

9999775820 was obtained and on analysis, the location of

abovementioned mobile no. 9999775820 was found in saket (where

the accused gathered before committing crime), Hauz Rani (Place of

occurrence) and Majidia Hospital (where the accused person gathered

after committing crime) which corroborated with the disclosures of

other accused persons.

6. Complainant Amit Kumar identified petitioner at Police Station

and stated that he was the person who had hit him with the baseball

bat on his face and shoulder on 05.05.2017. Though it is submitted by

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner that PW-1 Amit Kumar has not

identified the petitioner. It is a settled law that evidence cannot be

discussed in detail at the stage of consideration of bail application

since no mini trial can be conducted at that stage. The Ld. Trial Court

will no doubt discuss the evidentiary value of the statement of PW-1

at the appropriate time. However, this fact cannot be ignored that the

petitioner has also been charged with an offence u/s. 302/34 IPC

besides Section 307 IPC. There is still other evidence on record and

whether it will help the prosecution or not and whether it will prove to

be relevant or not will be decided by the Ld. Trial Court. The Court

can also not ignore the fact that complainant/ injured in examination in

chief has deposed about the threat extended to him and it runs as

under:-

"After the present incident, on 2-3 occasions, outside my house, some boys including Bittoo, Nikki, Babu and other boys came and they shouted "kya chahta hain, gawahi thodega ya nahi thodega'.

7. With the above threat extended to the witness coupled with

above discussion and also in view of the nature of allegations leveled

against the petitioner, no grounds for bail are made out. The bail

application is, therefore, dismissed.

BRIJESH SETHI, J NOVEMBER 21, 2019 Amit

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter