Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 5578 Del
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2019
$~52
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 13.11.2019
+ CRL.M.C. 5742/2019 & CRL.M.A. 40051/2019-Stay
ARVINDER SINGH KALARA & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Tanuj Arora, Adv. with
petitioners in person
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. K K Ghai, APP for State
SI Dharmender Kumar & SI Sanjay,
P.S. Roop Nagar
Mr. Jujhar Singh, Adv. for R-2 with
R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Crl. M.A. 40052/2019 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 5742/2019
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR
No.193/2012 dated 19./10.2012 registered at Police Station Roop Nagar,
District North Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
2. Notice issued.
3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the
respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the
present petition is taken up for final disposal.
4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 19.11.2000 as
per Sikh rites and rituals. One female child was born out of the wedlock
namely Simerpreet Kaur. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the
petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately since 2011.
5. The petitioners and respondent no.2 settled all their disputes before
the Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi vide settlement deed dated
31.05.2018, copy whereof is on record as Annexure P-3.
6. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been
identified by SI Dharmender Kumar of Police Station Roop Nagar and
submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the
matter any further. She also admits having received the settled amount of
₹2,50,000/- from the petitioners by way of demand draft no. 086651 dated
05.09.2019 drawn on Syndicate Bank.
7. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the
petitioners any further.
8. For the reasons afore-recorded, the No.193/2012 dated 19./10.2012
registered at Police Station Roop Nagar and consequent proceedings
therefrom are quashed.
9. The petition is allowed accordingly.
Dasti.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE NOVEMBER 13, 2019 SM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!