Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ayesha Siddiqui vs State (Nct Of Delhi) & Ors.
2019 Latest Caselaw 5456 Del

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 5456 Del
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2019

Delhi High Court
Ayesha Siddiqui vs State (Nct Of Delhi) & Ors. on 6 November, 2019
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                    Date of decision: November 06, 2019

+      W.P.(CRL) 1679/2019
       AYESHA SIDDIQUI                                    ..... Petitioner
                    Through:           In person.

                          Versus

       STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.           ..... Respondents
                     Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, Additional
                               Public Prosecutor for State with
                               SI Satish Singh & SI Gaurav Dalal
       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI

                          JUDGMENT

BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral)

Vide this petition, petitioner is seeking a direction to the SHO Sangam Vihar to provide protection from respondents No.2, 3 and 4.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State has placed on record a detailed status report dated 5th November, 2019. According to the status report, during investigation of the case, certain photocopies of the documents pertaining to the property in question were provided by the petitioner, which were illegible and therefore, petitioner's ownership could not be authenticated/verified. It is also stated in the status report that two parties are claiming ownership over the property in question.

On the other hand, petitioner submits that a decree in respect of property in question was passed in her favour by the learned trial court and prays for protection from respondents No.2 to 4.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel for respondent/State submits that the protection required will be provided to the petitioners.

Let Mobile number of Beat Constable, Division Officer as well as SHO be provided to the petitioner forthwith so that in case of an exigency, the petitioner can contact the concerned officials, who may handle the situation as per the law.

In view of the above, learned counsel for petitioner does not press this petition.

The petition stands disposed of.

(BRIJESH SETHI) JUDGE NOVEMBER 06, 2019 r

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter