Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vicky vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi)
2019 Latest Caselaw 557 Del

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 557 Del
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2019

Delhi High Court
Vicky vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 29 January, 2019
$~17
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%                                   Judgment delivered on: 29.01.2019
+   BAIL APPLN. 137/2019
VICKY                                                          ..... Petitioner
                    versus

STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)                       ..... Respondent
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ravi Drall, Adv.
For the Respondent:  Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State

CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

                                JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioner seeks interim bail in FIR No. 260/2016 under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 IPC at Police Station Deshbandhu Gupta Road, Delhi for a period of two months to undergo treatment and surgery for gall bladder stone.

2. The medical condition of the petitioner has been verified. The verification report in the form of questions put by the IO and the response given by the Office of Senior Medical Officer of Central Jail has been produced and the same are taken on record.

3. As per the medical verification report, the Medical Officer Incharge has reported that the petitioner suffers from gall bladder stone and has been advised for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy surgery. However, the surgery could not be performed on the date when the surgery was fixed i.e.

17.01.2019 as he was suffering from fever rhinorrhoea and cough and the surgery was deferred.

4. It is further stated that Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is not possible in Central jail Hospital Dispensary.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would like to have the surgery done privately from a private hospital.

6. Keeping in view of the totality of the facts and circumstances and also the medical condition of the petitioner, I am of the view that petitioner is entitled to interim bail for a period of two months.

7. Accordingly, on petitioner furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, petitioner shall be released on interim bail for a period of two months from the date of his release. Petitioner shall not do anything which may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses.

8. Petitioner is directed to intimate, to the IO, the date of his admission and the name of and address of the hospital where he is admitted for his treatment/surgery. The petitioner shall surrender to the concerned Superintendent, Jail on expiry of the period of two months of his release.

9. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

10. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

JANUARY 29, 2019/'rs'                            SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J


 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter