Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 6750 Del
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2019
$~20
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 23.12.2019
+ CRL.M.C. 6638/2019
RAJIV KUMAR GUPTA & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through Mr. Sandeep Garusa with Mr. Ajay
Kumar, Advs.
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through Mr.Kamal Kr. Ghai, APP for State.
SI Ajay Pal, PS Madhu Vihar, ASI
Brijeshwar Dayal, CAW Cell/East.
Mr. Sushil Thakur, Adv. for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Crl. M.A. 43286/2019
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 6638/2019
3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.
396/2016 dated 26.08.2016 registered at Police Station Pandav Nagar and
consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the
respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the
present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 06.07.2014 as
per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the
petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately.
7. The petitioner and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well
wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide mutual
settlement/agreement executed on 02.05.2019 and settled all their disputes
amicably.
8. The total settlement amount is ₹32,00,000/-(Rupees Thirty Two
Lakhs only). It is submitted that the respondent no.2 has already received an
amount of ₹23,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Three Lakhs Only). A demand
draft bearing No.780084 dated 16.12.2019 for the balance amount of
₹9,00,000/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Only) is handed over to the respondent No.
2 today in the Court.
9. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been
identified by SI Ajay Pal of Police Station Madhu Vihar and submits that
matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any
further.
10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
the FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners
any further.
11. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.396/2016 dated
26.08.2016 registered at Police Station Pandav Nagar and consequent
proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
12. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
13. Order dasti.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE DECEMBER 23, 2019 ab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!