Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shadam Hussain vs State Of Delhi & Ors.
2018 Latest Caselaw 5808 Del

Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 5808 Del
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2018

Delhi High Court
Shadam Hussain vs State Of Delhi & Ors. on 25 September, 2018
$~81
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                                   Judgment delivered on:25.09.2018

+     CRL.M.C. 4895/2018
      SHADAM HUSSAIN                                  ..... Petitioner
                           versus

      STATE OF DELHI & ORS.                           ..... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner :      Ms. Parul Rohatgi, Advocate with
                          petitioner in person.

For the Respondents :      Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State
                           with SI Devender.
                           Mr. Ishwar Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2.

CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
                             JUDGMENT

25.09.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.558/2016 under Sections 354/509 IPC, Police Station Kotwali, based on the settlement.

2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner, who is a tailor, had misbehaved with the complainant respondent No.2 when she had gone for having her clothes stitched. Respondent Nos.3 and 4 are cited as witnesses to the said incident.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their disputes. Settlement Deed dated 05.09.2018 has been executed.

4. The petitioner, who is present in Court in person, has expressed remorse at his conduct and has apologised to respondent No.2/complainant.

5. The respondent No.2 and 4 are present in Court in person and identified by the Investigating Officer. Respondent No. 3 is represented by Respondent No. 4. Respondent No. 2 submits that she has settled her disputes with the petitioner and does not wish to prosecute the complaint against the petitioner any further and has no objection to the quashing of the subject FIR.

6. In view of the fact that the parties have resolved their disputes and respondent No. 2 does not wish to press her complaint, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

7. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.558/2016 under Sections 354/509 IPC, Police Station Kotwali and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed, subject to

the petitioner depositing costs of Rs.3,000/- with the "Chief Minister's Distress Relief Fund (CMDRF), Kerala", within a period of two weeks from today. Receipt of deposit of the costs imposed by this Order be furnished to the concerned Investigating Officer within a period of three weeks from today

8. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

SEPTEMBER 25, 2018                 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
st





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter