Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abhishek Naiwal vs The State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) & ...
2018 Latest Caselaw 5434 Del

Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 5434 Del
Judgement Date : 10 September, 2018

Delhi High Court
Abhishek Naiwal vs The State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) & ... on 10 September, 2018
$~4
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                               Judgment delivered on: 10.09.2018
+      CRL.M.C. 3581/2018
       ABHISHEK NAIWAL                                    ..... Petitioner
                                versus
       THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
                                           ..... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner :      Mr. Harish Kumar, Adv

For the Respondents:      Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP for the State.
                          SI Praveen Kumar PS Mandawali.
                          Mr.Ravendra Kumar, Adv. for R-2.

CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
                   JUDGMENT

10.09.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 173/2014 under Sections 324/341/34 IPC registered Police Station Mandawali, based on a settlement.

2. The subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had fought with the complainant.

3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes by way of a settlement. As per the settlement, a

total sum of Rs. 25,000/- has been agreed to be paid to respondent no.

2. The entire amount has already been paid.

4. The Respondent no. 2 is present in Court, represented by his counsel and is identified by the Investigating Officer. Respondent no.2 submits that he has settled disputes with the petitioner and does not wish to prosecute the complaint any further and has no objection to the quashing of the subject FIR.

5. In view of the fact that the parties have resolved their disputes and respondent no.2 does not wish to press his complaint, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed FIR No. 173/2014 under Sections 324/341/34 IPC registered Police Station Mandawali, based on a settlement and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.

7. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

SEPTEMBER 10, 2018                        SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
ab



 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter