Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chand Mohd & Anr vs The State & Anr
2018 Latest Caselaw 5966 Del

Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 5966 Del
Judgement Date : 1 October, 2018

Delhi High Court
Chand Mohd & Anr vs The State & Anr on 1 October, 2018
$~17
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                                   Judgment delivered on: 01.10.2018

+       CRL.M.C. 2514/2018
        CHAND MOHD & ANR                                 ..... Petitioners

                           versus

        THE STATE & ANR                                  ..... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioners:      Mr. Rajesh Tiwari, Advocate.

For the Respondents:       Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP for the State.
                           ASI Rajvir, PS Amar Colony.

CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

                              JUDGMENT

01.10.2018

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 399/2010 under Sections 382/342/323/34 IPC, Police Station Amar Colony.

2. The allegation against the petitioners is that they had forcefully taken the complainant to their shop and snatched Rs.1,00,000/- from his pocket and when the same was demanded, the complainant was assaulted.

3. Parties were referred to mediation and they have settled their

disputes before the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts on 14.07.2016.

4. Respondent No.2 is present in Court in person, identified by the Investigating Officer. Respondent No.2 has placed on record photocopy of his Aadhar Card. He confirms that he has settled with the petitioners and does not wish to prosecute the FIR any further and has no objection to the quashing of the FIR.

5. In view of the fact that the respondent No.2 has settled his disputes with the petitioners and does not wish to prosecute the complaint any further, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.

6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 399/2010 under Sections 382/342/323/34 IPC, Police Station Amar Colony and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are, accordingly, quashed.

7. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J OCTOBER 01, 2018/st

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter