Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Satyendra Kumar vs Maharaja Agarsain Public School ...
2018 Latest Caselaw 1806 Del

Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 1806 Del
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2018

Delhi High Court
Satyendra Kumar vs Maharaja Agarsain Public School ... on 16 March, 2018
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                           Date of Order: March 16, 2018

+                                  W.P.(C) 2404/2018
       SATYENDRA KUMAR                                 .....Petitioner
                   Through:             Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate

                          versus

       MAHARAJA AGARSAIN PUBLIC SCHOOL (RECOGNIZED)
       & ANR.                                  .....Respondents
                   Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC,
                   Mr. Abhinav Goyal and Ms. Mahamaya
                   Chatterjee, Advocates
       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

                          ORDER

(ORAL)

1. A mandamus is sought to respondent-Directorate of Education to enforce the provisions of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 and on failure of respondent-School to follow the provisions of the said Act, to take action against first respondent as per Delhi School Education Act, 1973. Mandamus is also sought to make payment of arrears of salary and other emoluments not being paid according to petitioner's actual entitlement, as per the prescribed pay scale for TGT w.e.f. 15th July, 2009 in compliance of provisions of Section 10 of the Delhi School Education Act and Rules 1973.

2. To seek the relief as claimed in this petition, no proper Representation has been made by petitioner.

3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with permission to petitioner to file a concise Representation to second respondent within a period of two weeks and upon receiving of such a Representation, the second respondent shall pass a speaking order thereon, within a period of six weeks and the fate of Representation be made known to petitioner within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.

4. With the aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of.

Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the parties.

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE MARCH 16, 2018 v

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter