Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 3989 Del
Judgement Date : 16 July, 2018
$~68
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Judgment delivered on: 16.07.2018
+ CRL.M.C. 3478/2018
ASHOK KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners
versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR..... Respondents
.
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioners : Mr. Prabhoo Dayal Tiwari with Mr. Surya Kumar and Ms.
Manisha Tiwari, Advocates
For the Respondent: Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State.
SI Amit Kumar, PS Ambedkar Nagar
CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT
16.07.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) CRL.M.C. 3478/2018
1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.258/2017 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Ambedkar Nagar.
2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2. Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent No.2.
Petitioner Nos.4 and 5 are the sisters-in-law of the respondent No.2.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes before the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts on 02.08.2017. The parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce by mutual consent, passed on 02.05.2018.
4. The respondent No.2 was to be paid a total sum of Rs.3,50,000/- in full and final settlement of all her claims. A sum of Rs.3,00,000/- has already been paid. The balance sum of Rs.50,000/- is being paid today to the respondent No.2 in court by way of Demand Draft No.022548 dated 10.07.2018 drawn on The Kangra Co- Operative Bank Ltd. for Rs.50,000/-.
5. The respondent No.2 is present in person, represented by counsel and is identified by the Investigating Officer/SI Amit Kumar, P.S. Ambedkar Nagar. She has filed a supporting affidavit as well as the identity proof. She submits that she has settled her disputes with the petitioners and does not wish to press charges against the petitioners and prosecute the complaint any further.
6. In view of the fact that the proceedings emanate out of a matrimonial discord and the parties have fully and finally settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has stated that she does not wish to press the complaint any further and the fact that the parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce by mutual
consent, passed on 02.05.2018, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.
7. In view of the above, No.258/2017 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Ambedkar Nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.
8. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J JULY 16, 2018 ns
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!