Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 7394 Del
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2018
$~40
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Order: 14.12.2018
+ FAO 563/2018
MRS. MADHU MANCHANDA AND ANR ..... Appellants
Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate
and Ms.Sunanda Tulsyan and
Ms. Aarti, Advs.
versus
M/S KRBL LIMITED ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate,
Mr.S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay
Amitabh Suman and Mr. Avi
Bhandari, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
1. Notice. Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate, accepts the notice on
behalf of the respondent.
2. After making some submissions, the learned counsel for the
appellants does not press the appeal but submits that directions
may be issued to the Trial Court to dispose of application under
Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC filed by the respondent/plaintiff and
their application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC. The next date of
hearing before the Trial Court is 22.01.2019.
F.A.O 563/2018 Page 1 of 2
3. Ex-parte injunction was granted by the trial court on 02.05.2016
against the appellant on the application of the respondent under
Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC. The application for vacation of stay
under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC was filed by the Appellant on
19.05.2016. Both these applications are still not disposed of by
the Trial Court.
4. In the circumstances, the appeal is disposed of with the
directions to the Trial Court to hear arguments on both the
applications on the next date and decide within a period of four
weeks.
VINOD GOEL, J.
DECEMBER 14, 2018 "sandeep"
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!