Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Devender & Ors. vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) & Anr.
2018 Latest Caselaw 5016 Del

Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 5016 Del
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2018

Delhi High Court
Devender & Ors. vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) & Anr. on 24 August, 2018
$~7

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                                   Judgment delivered on: 24.08.2018

+      CRL.M.C. 3257/2018
DEVENDER & ORS                                            ..... Petitioners
                           versus

STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR                    ..... Respondents

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Petitioners :      Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj & Ms. Sabhya Jain, Advs.

For the Respondents:       Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State
                           with SI Rahul Kumar

CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
                  JUDGMENT

24.08.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 1095 of 2006 under Sections 452/427/323/34 of the IPC registered at Police Station Shakarpur, Delhi, based on a settlement.

2. The parties are neighbours. The subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel which took place between the parties. It is

contended that the dispute occurred on the spur of moment without any premeditation. It is submitted that the co-accused Mahesh Kumar has expired on 22.04.2015 and the other two co-accused namely, Sanjay and Dharmender have already been declared proclaimed offender on 25.11.2014.

3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes with the intervention of other members of the society. Both the parties have assured that they have restored cordial relationship and shall not quarrel with each other in future. They have also filed their supporting affidavits.

4. Respondent nos. 2 is present in court in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She submits that she has settled the disputes with the petitioners and is agreeable to the settlement and does not wish to press the criminal charges against the petitioners any further.

5. In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and respondent no. 2 have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and

the consequent proceedings emanating there from qua the petitioners.

6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 1095 of 2006 under Sections 452/427/323/34 of the IPC registered at Police Station Shakarpur, Delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are accordingly quashed qua the petitioners.

7. This would be without prejudice to the proceedings against the co-accused Sanjay and Dharmender who have been declared 'Proclaimed Offenders'.

8. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J AUGUST 24, 2018 'rs'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter