Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Major Dr. Ravinder Kumar (Retd.) vs Delhi Cantonment Board And Anr.
2018 Latest Caselaw 2094 Del

Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 2094 Del
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2018

Delhi High Court
Major Dr. Ravinder Kumar (Retd.) vs Delhi Cantonment Board And Anr. on 4 April, 2018
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                              Date of Order: April 04, 2018

+                    W.P.(C) 3250/2018 & CM 12788/2018

       MAJOR DR. RAVINDER KUMAR (RETD.)       ..... Petitioner
                    Through: Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate
                     versus

       DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD AND ANR.       .....Respondents
                   Through: Mr. Anchit Sharma, Advocate
       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

                              ORDER

(ORAL)

1. Petitioner seeks a mandamus to first respondent to appoint him as General Duty Medical Officer (for short GDMO) against a vacancy declared on 31st October, 2016, which, according to petitioner, is still vacant. To seek the relief, as sought in this petition, a Representation (Annexure P-11) was made by petitioner on 17th March, 2018 to first respondent. According to learned counsel for petitioner, there is no response to the said Representation (Annexure P-11).

2. Learned counsel for respondents submits that the said Representation (Annexure P-11) would be positively decided within a period of four weeks from today.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that till it is so done, let the vacancy in question be not carried forward or abolished.

4. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to first respondent to effectively consider petitioner's Representation (Annexure P-11) in light of Supreme Court's order of 26th July, 2013 in CC 10604/2013 titled State of U.P. & Anr. v. Rajiv Kumar Srivastava and Anr., within four weeks from today and its fate be made known to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be. Till it is so done, the post in question be not carried forward or abolished.

5. With aforesaid directions, this petition and the application are disposed of.

Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the parties.

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE APRIL 04, 2018 s

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter