Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4998 Del
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2017
$~13
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 3390/2017
ROOP RAM & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through Mr. Lave Kr. Sharma, Adv. with
Mr.Saket Gogia, Adv. with petitioners in person.
versus
STATE OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents
Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State
with SI Jaichand, P.S. Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi.
Mr. Kuldeep Rai, Advocate for R-3 along with
respondent No.3 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
ORDER
% 12.09.2017
1. Respondent no. 3 is present in court. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO SI Jaichand.
2. The petitioners have approached this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'Cr.PC') for quashing of the FIR bearing No.32/2013, registered on 29.01.2013 against them with Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, North West District, Delhi, under Sections 354/509/34 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.3.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over certified copies of orders passed in connected cases. Same are taken on record.
4. The marriage of the son of petitioner no.1 namely Praveen Bharti with the respondent no. 3 was solemnized on 01.09.1997. However, due to some disputes between them, they could not reconcile with each
other. Resultantly, the respondent no.3 left the matrimonial home and she lodged a complaint with CAW Cell which culminated into FIR No.157/2006 under section 498A/406/34 IPC, PS Mukherjee Nagar, District North-West, Delhi against her husband and his family members. Subsequently, the matter was settled by the respondent no.3 with them. A decree of divorce was granted by the learned Principal Judge-I, Family Court, Rohini Court, Delhi on 13.09.2012 by mutual consent, by which the marriage between the respondent no.3 and Praveen Bharti was dissolved.
5. Later on due to some disputes between the respondent no.3 and her in laws, the above said FIR No.32/2013 in question was registered against the petitioners.
6. Admittedly, the FIR No.157/2006 under section 498A/406/34 IPC was quashed by this Court in Crl.M.C. 890/2013 on 24.09.2013.
7. The petitioners and the respondent no. 3 have settled their disputes pertaining to FIR No. 32/2013. Copy of Memorandum of Understanding dated 11.08.2017 is already on record. The respondent No.2 states that she has voluntarily settled and resolved all disputes with the petitioners without any force and coercion. She submits that she does not want to pursue the said FIR. She submits that the said FIR may be quashed.
8. Learned ASC through IO submits that the charge sheet has already been filed against the petitioners.
9. Since the parties have amicably settled all their disputes, no fruitful purpose would be served in further pursuing the said FIR. Hence, to secure ends of justice, the FIR bearing No.32/2013, registered on
29.01.2013 against them with Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, North West District, Delhi, under Sections 354/509/34 IPC and proceedings arising out of the said FIR are hereby quashed.
10. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
11. DASTI.
VINOD GOEL, J.
SEPTEMBER 12, 2017/jitender
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!