Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Parth Chaudhary & Anr. vs State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi
2017 Latest Caselaw 2226 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 2226 Del
Judgement Date : 4 May, 2017

Delhi High Court
Parth Chaudhary & Anr. vs State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi on 4 May, 2017
$~
*        IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                     DECIDED ON : MAY 04, 2017

+              CRL.M.C. 451/2016 & Crl.M.A.1891/2016

       PARTH CHAUDHARY & ANR.                               ..... Petitioners
                            Through :    Mr.S.N.Bhardwaj, Advocate.
                            versus

       STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI                           ..... Respondent
                            Through :    Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP.
        CORAM:
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

S.P.GARG, J. (ORAL)

Crl.M.A.1892/2016

1. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in filing the petition is condoned.

2. The application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 451/2016 & Crl.M.A.1891/2016

3. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.84/2010 registered under Sections 186/353/332/34 IPC at Police Station Inder Puri. Prayer has also been made to set aside order dated 18.8.2015 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate. Status report is on record.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, opted to give up relief regarding quashing of the FIR on merits.

5. Trial Court record reveals that the defence witnesses have been examined before recording of the statements of the accused persons under Section 313 Cr.P.C. By an order dated 7.4.2015, the case was adjourned for recording statements of the accused persons on 18.8.2015. On 18.8.2015, instead of recording statement of the accused persons under Section 313 Cr.P.C., the learned Trial Court proceeded to record the statement of the defence witnesses DW-1 (Ramji Lal) and DW-2 (Raju). Apparently, there is a lapse on the part of the Trial Court to examine the defence witnesses without examining the accused persons under Section 313 Cr.P.C. The order dated 18.8.2015 thus cannot be sustained and is set aside.

6. The Trial Court shall first record the statements of the accused persons under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and shall examine the defence witnesses (if any) thereafter.

7. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms. All pending application(s) also stand dispose of.

8. Trial Court record be sent back forthwith along with the copy of the order.

(S.P.GARG) JUDGE MAY 04, 2017/sa

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter