Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vimal Kishor vs Northern Railway & Anr.
2017 Latest Caselaw 3274 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3274 Del
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2017

Delhi High Court
Vimal Kishor vs Northern Railway & Anr. on 14 July, 2017
$~23
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                                   Date of Decision:14th July, 2017


+     W.P.(C) 922/2016

      VIMAL KISHOR                                   ..... Appellant
                         Through:    Mr.Anjani Kumar Singh, Advocate

                         versus


      NORTHERN RAILWAY & ANR.                 ..... Respondents
                  Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Adv. for Railways.
                           Mr. Desh Raj and Mr. Pradeep, Advs.
                           for R2.
                           Mr. Anoop J. Bhambhani, Sr. Adv. as
                           amicus curiae with Ms. Lakshita
                           Sethi, Adv.

      CORAM:
      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA


                          JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. On 27th July, 2014 at about 06:30 pm, the petitioner and other workers were working on the Railway track near Hazrat Nizamuddin Railway Station under the employment of respondent no.2. The petitioner was working inside the track whereas the co-workers were working outside the track. Due to the fault of the line-man employed by respondent No.2 in signaling the workers to keep away from the track, both legs of the petitioner were crushed by the train. The petitioner was taken to AIIMS Trauma Centre

where both his legs were amputated. The police registered DD No.16A. The petitioner is seeking compensation of Rs.24,00,000/- for the amputation of both the legs.

2. The accident dated 27th July, 2014 arose out of and during the course of the employment of the petitioner with respondent no.2 and the petitioner is entitled to compensation of Rs.11,76,989/- under the Employees' Compensation Act as per break-up given hereunder:-

Salary of the petitioner (maximum as per Rs. 8,000/- notification) 60% of the salary for the purpose of Rs. 4,800/-

        computation of compensation
        Age of the petitioner at the time of              27 years
        accident
        Appropriate  factor according to                  213.57
        Schedule IV of the Employees'
        Compensation Act
        Compensation amount                             Rs.10,25,136/-
                                                    (Rs.4,800 x 213.57)
        Medical expenditure                             Rs.   1,853/-

        Expenditure on artificial limbs                 Rs.1,50,000/-

        TOTAL COMPENSATION                            Rs.11,76,989/-



3. Respondent no.2 was liable to deposit the compensation amount with the Commissioner, Employees' Compensation as soon as it fell due.

Admittedly respondent no.2 has not deposited the compensation amount with the Commissioner, Employees' Compensation within one month of

the accident and therefore, respondent no.2 is liable to pay penalty upto 50% of the compensation amount under Section 4A(3) of the Employees' Compensation Act. Considering that respondents no.1 and 2 have deposited Rs.5 lakh each under the orders of this Court, a lenient view is taken and penalty of Rs.73,011/- is imposed on respondent no.2. The total liability of respondent no.2 is held to be Rs.12,50,000/- (Rs.11,76,989/- + Rs.73,011/-)

4. In the present case, respondent no.2 is the contractor who had been awarded the contract for maintenance of Railway lines and slippers by the Railways. Respondent no.1 is the principal whereas respondent no.2 is the contractor. Under Section 12 of the Employees' Compensation Act, the principal is liable to deposit the compensation amount and thereafter, recover it from the contractor. Applying Section 12 of the Employees' Compensation Act, respondent no.1 is held liable to deposit the compensation amount and thereafter, recover the same from respondent no.2.

5. The writ petition is allowed and respondent no.2 is held liable to pay Rs.12,50,000/- along with interest @ 12% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.11,76,989/- from 28th August, 2014 till realization. Respondent no.1, being the principal, is held liable to deposit the compensation amount with right to recover the same from respondent no.2.

6. Respondent No.1 as well as respondent No.2 have deposited Rs.5,00,000/- each with the Registrar General of this Court in terms of the orders dated 24th May, 2016 and 30th May, 2016. Respondent No.1 is directed to deposit the balance compensation amount of Rs.2,50,000/- along with interest @ 12% per annum on Rs.11,76,989/- from 28th August,

2014 within four weeks (Interest on Rs.5,00,000/- from 28th August, 2014 up to 24th May, 2016, interest on Rs.2,56,920/- from 28th August, 2014 to 05th September, 2016, interest on Rs.2,43,080/- from 28th August, 2014 to 02nd November, 2016 and interest on balance Rs.1,76,989/- from 28th August, 2014 up to the date of the deposit). Respondent No.1 is granted recovery rights to recover the aforesaid amount from respondent No.2 after deposit of the aforesaid amount by respondent No.1.

7. List for disbursement of compensation amount on 17th August, 2017.

8. Copy of this judgment be given dasti to counsels for the parties under the signature of the Court Master.

JULY 14, 2017                                          J.R. MIDHA, J.
Ak





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter