Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sardar Ravinder Pal Singh vs Sardar Pritam Singh & Ors
2017 Latest Caselaw 1786 Del

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 1786 Del
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2017

Delhi High Court
Sardar Ravinder Pal Singh vs Sardar Pritam Singh & Ors on 11 April, 2017
$~15.
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+       CO.APP. 3/1991
        SARDAR RAVINDER PAL SINGH                ..... Appellant
                    Through: Mr. S.M. Saxena, Advocate

                          versus

        SARDAR PRITAM SINGH & ORS                 ..... Respondents
                     Through: Mr. K.B. Soni, Advocate

        CORAM:
        HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
        HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

                          ORDER

% 11.04.2017

1. The appellant has assailed an order dated 28.11.1990 passed by the learned Company Judge, allowing CA 4054/89 and dismissing CA 7570- 71/89 and CA 470/90. By the said order, the Administrator was directed to take complete charge of the Naya Bazar godown and the appellant was directed to hand over complete records, cash and other papers of the company to the Administrator. Further, the appellant was refrained from interfering in the conduct of the business of the company, namely, Northern India Goods Transport Co. (P) Ltd. Several other directions issued by the learned Company Judge have been set out at pages 38-40 of the paper book.

2. Counsels for the parties inform the Court that during the pendency of the present appeal, company petition bearing CP 89/69 was disposed of on 24.03.2005 and a Local Commissioner was appointed to submit a report

with regard to the shareholding pattern of the company, which report is under active consideration before the Company Judge and the said case is now listed on 31.05.2017.

3. In view of the fact that the Company Petition in which the impugned order was passed stands disposed of over a decade ago, nothing further survives for adjudication in the present appeal, which has unfortunately remained pending for several years only to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased respondents No.4 and 5.

4. The present appeal is disposed of with liberty granted to the appellant to pursue the objections stated to have been filed by him to the report submitted by the Local Commissioner.

HIMA KOHLI, J

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J APRIL 11, 2017 rkb

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter