Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Eneroil Offshore Drilling Ltd vs Centek Limited
2016 Latest Caselaw 5907 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 5907 Del
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2016

Delhi High Court
Eneroil Offshore Drilling Ltd vs Centek Limited on 8 September, 2016
$~20.
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+       CS(COMM) 77/2016 and I.A. 1597/2016
        ENEROIL OFFSHORE DRILLING LTD             ..... Plaintiff
                     Through: Ms. Namrita Kochhar, Advocate with
                     Ms. Neha Khanduri, Advocate

                           versus

        CENTEK LIMITED                            ..... Defendant
                     Through: Mr. Aditya Gupta, Advocate

        CORAM:
        HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

                         ORDER

% 08.09.2016 I.A. 10955/2016 (joint application u/O XXIII R 3 CPC)

1. The present application has been jointly filed by the parties stating inter alia that during the pendency of the suit proceedings, they have been able to arrive at an out of court settlement.

2. The terms and conditions of the settlement have been set out in para 2 of the application, whereunder the plaintiff has undertaken that it has not been using Boron steel or its equivalent for the manufacture of its single piece centralizers or committed any other act to infringe the defendant's patent No.237022, during its term. The plaintiff has also confirmed that it has been using spring steel or its equivalent for manufacturing its products. The remaining terms and conditions of the settlement have been set out in paras 2(c) to (e). Counsels for the parties state that the suit may be disposed of in terms of the settlement recorded in the present application.

3. The Court has pursued the present application. The same has been signed by the authorized representatives of the plaintiff and the defendant and their respective counsels and is supported by the affidavits of the signatories to the application.

4. As counsels for the parties jointly state that their clients have arrived at the aforesaid settlement of their own free will and volition and without any undue influence or coercion from any quarters, there appears no legal impediment in accepting the settlement. The parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement recorded in the application.

5. The suit is disposed of alongwith the pending application, while leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

6. File be consigned to the record room.

HIMA KOHLI, J SEPTEMBER 08, 2016 rkb

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter