Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bajaj Allianz General Insurane Co ... vs Maya Devi & Ors
2016 Latest Caselaw 6633 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6633 Del
Judgement Date : 24 October, 2016

Delhi High Court
Bajaj Allianz General Insurane Co ... vs Maya Devi & Ors on 24 October, 2016
$~34
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%                              Date of Decision: 24th October, 2016

+     MAC.APP. 512/2015 and C.M. Appl. Nos.11614/2015 &
      14066/2016

      BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL
      INSURANE CO LTD.                     .... Appellant
                    Through: Mr. Rajat Brar, Advocate

                         versus

      MAYA DEVI & ORS                               ..... Respondents
                   Through:          Mr. Niteshwar Singh and
                                     Mr.Amreshwar              Singh,
                                     Advocates for respondents No.1
                                     to 6

      CORAM:
      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

                      JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.11,49,556/- has been awarded to claimants/respondents No.1 to 6.

2. The accident dated 01st June, 2008 resulted in the death of Om Prakash. The deceased was 54 years of age at the time of accident and was working as a cart-seller. The Claims Tribunal took minimum wages as income of the deceased, added 30% towards inflation, deducted 1/3rd towards his personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 11 to compute the loss of dependency of Rs.4,79,556/-.

The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.25,000/- towards medical expenses, Rs.6,00,000/- towards loss of love and affection, Rs.10,000/- towards loss of consortium, Rs.10,000/- towards loss of estate and Rs.25,000/- towards funeral expenses. The total compensation awarded is Rs.11,49,556/-

3. Learned counsel for the appellant urged at the time of hearing of this appeal that the compensation awarded under the heads of loss of love and affection be reduced to Rs.1 lakh; the addition of 30% towards inflation be set aside, and the recovery rights be given to the appellant as the offending vehicle was being driven by a minor.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that compensation awarded under the head of loss of consortium be enhanced.

5. This Court is of the view that the compensation awarded under the head of loss of love and affection warrants reduction. The compensation of loss of love and affection is reduced from Rs.6,00,000/- to Rs.2,00,000/-. The compensation awarded under the head of loss of consortium is enhanced from Rs.10,000/- to Rs.1,00,000/-. There is no infirmity in addition of 30% towards inflation on the minimum wages. The offending vehicle was driven by a minor at the time of accident and, therefore, the appellant is granted recovery rights against respondents No.7 and 8.

6. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is reduced from Rs.11,49,556/- to Rs.8,39,556/- along with interest @ 9% per annum from date of filing of petition. As the driver of offending vehicle was minor at the time of the accident, the appellant are granted recovery rights to recover the award amount from respondents no.7 and 8.

7. The appellant has deposited Rs.18,55,068/- with the Registrar General of this Court which is lying in fixed deposit.

8. The appellants are entitled to Rs.8,59,556/- along with interest thereon which as on today comes to Rs.14,49,005/-and the balance amount of Rs.4,06,063/- is to be refunded to the appellant, as per the calculation done by the Accounts Officer of this Court. The Registrar General is directed to instruct UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch to refund Rs.4,06,063/- as well as the statutory amount to the appellant.

9. The Registrar General is further directed to instruct UCO Bank to disburse Rs.14,49,005/- by keeping Rs.13 lakh in FDRs in the following manner:

Sr. Duration Resp. 1 Resp. 2 Resp. 3 Resp. 4 Resp. 5 Resp. 6 No. of FDR Widow Son Son Daughter Daughter Daughter (in Rs.) (in Rs.) (in Rs.) (in Rs.) (in Rs.) (in Rs.)

1. 1 yr 1,00,000/- 40,000/- 40,000/- 40,000/- 40,000/- 40,000/-

2. 2 yrs 1,00,000/- 40,000/- 40,000/- 40,000/- 40,000/- 40,000/-

3. 3 yrs 1,00,000/- 40,000/- 40,000/- 40,000/- 40,000/- 40,000/-

 4.     4 yrs     1,00,000/-         -            -            -               -                    -

 5.     5 yrs     1,00,000/-         -            -            -               -                    -

 6.     6 yrs     1,00,000/-         -            -            -               -                    -

 7.     7 yrs     1,00,000/-         -            -            -               -                    -

      TOTAL       7,00,000/-     1,20,000/-   1,20,000/-   1,20,000/-      1,20,000/-       1,20,000/-

                              GRAND TOTAL                                          Rs.13,00,000/-



10. The balance, amount after keeping Rs.13,00,000/- in FDRs, be released to respondents No.1 to 6 by transferring the same to their individual savings bank accounts in equal shares.

11. The monthly interest on the FDRs of the respondents shall be

credited to their individual savings bank accounts.

12. At the time of maturity, the fixed deposit amount shall be credited in the savings bank accounts of the beneficiaries.

13. All the original FDRs shall be retained by UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch. However, the photocopies of the same shall be provided to the respondents/beneficiaries.

14. No cheque book or debit card be issued to the claimants/respondents without permission of this Court.

15. No loan or advance or pre-mature discharge shall be permitted without the permission of this Court.

16. The claimants/respondents shall approach the UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch for completing the formalities for the disbursement of the award amount in terms of this order.

17. The UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch shall ensure that the savings bank accounts of respondents are individual accounts and not joint accounts.

18. The respondents/claimants are at liberty to approach this Court for release of further amount in case of any financial exigency.

19. Appeal and the pending applications are disposed of.

20. Copy of this judgment be given dasti to learned counsels for the parties under signature of Court Master.

OCTOBER 24, 2016                                         J.R. MIDHA, J.
rsk





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter