Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishwajeet Rana & Ors vs The State & Ors
2016 Latest Caselaw 4168 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4168 Del
Judgement Date : 30 May, 2016

Delhi High Court
Vishwajeet Rana & Ors vs The State & Ors on 30 May, 2016
56
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                Date of decision: 30th May, 2016

W.P.(CRL) 1746/2016

VISHWAJEET RANA & ORS                                             ..... Petitioners

                                 Through:   Mr Surender Nandal, Advocate.



                                 versus



THE STATE & ORS                                                 ..... Respondents

Through: Mr Ashish Aggarwal, Addl. Standing Counsel (Crl.) with ASI Tej Ram, PS-

Najafgarh.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)

1. The present is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

seeking quashing of FIR No.99/2016 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC

registered at Police Station- Najafgarh, Delhi.

2. Manju, respondent no. 2/complainant (wife) in the subject FIR, who is

present in Court and has been identified by the Investigating Officer in the

subject FIR namely, ASI Tej Ram, Police Station- Najafgarh, Delhi, states

that she has amicably resolved all her outstanding matrimonial disputes with

her husband, petitioner no.1 herein, and the other petitioners, who are her in-

laws.

3. Manju, respondent no. 2/complainant (wife) further states that

pursuant to the amicable resolution of the disputes between the parties, she

has been living in her matrimonial home happily since a couple of months.

She further states that she has a ten-month-old son, namely, Master Shresht

and that the present FIR has the potential to complicate and jeopardize her

family life. She, therefore, states that she is no longer keen to prosecute with

the subject FIR.

4. Notice.

5. Mr Ashish Aggarwal, learned Addl. Standing Counsel (Crl.) appearing

on behalf of the official respondent accepts notice and fairly does not oppose

the petition in view of the facts and circumstances afore-stated.

6. It is observed that the present case does not fall within the categories

exempted from quashing in terms of the decision of the Supreme Court in

Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303,

since it does not affect the general public at large and is a private affair.

7. In view of the foregoing, the present writ petition is allowed. FIR

No.99/2016 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station-

Najafgarh, Delhi is hereby set aside and quashed qua the petitioners.

8. With the above directions the writ petition is allowed and disposed of

accordingly.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J MAY 30, 2016 mk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter