Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4112 Del
Judgement Date : 30 May, 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMPANY PETITION NO. 529/2015
Reserved on 4th May, 2016
Date of pronouncement: 30th May, 2016
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 67 to 87
of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959
Scheme of Amalgamation of:
ExlService SEZ BPO Solutions Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 1
Exl Support Services Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 2
WITH
Exl Service.com (India) Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferee Company
Through Mr. Dhritiman Bhattacharyya
with Ms.Sakshi Jain and Ms Deeti
Ojha, Advocates for the petitioners
Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Assistant
Registrar of Companies for the
Regional Director
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 67 to 87 of the Companies (Court)
Rules, 1959 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction of the Scheme
of Amalgamation of ExlService SEZ BPO Solutions Private Limited
(hereinafter referred to as the transferor company no. 1) and Exl Support
Services Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor
company no. 2) with Exl Service.com (India) Private Limited (hereinafter
referred to as the transferee company).
2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies
are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.
3. The transferor company no. 1 was incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 15th January, 2009 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
4. The transferor company no. 2 was incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 25th March, 2004 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
5. The transferee company was originally incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 21st May, 1999 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi under the name and
style of EXL Services.com (India) Private Limited. The company changed
its name to exl Service.com (India) Private Limited and obtained the fresh
certificate of incorporation on 28th November, 2000.
6. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.1 is Rs.15,00,00,000/- divided into 1,50,00,000 equity shares of
Rs.10/- each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the
company is Rs.13,76,55,000/- divided into 1,37,65,500 equity shares of
Rs.10/- each.
7. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.2 is Rs.10,00,000/- divided into 1,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-
each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company
is Rs.1,00,000/- divided into 10,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
8. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is
Rs.15,00,00,000/- divided into 1,50,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is
Rs.13,41,70,290/- divided into 1,34,17,029 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
9. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the
transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record with the
joint application, being CA(M) 111/2015, earlier filed by the petitioners.
The audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2014, of the transferor
and transferee companies, along with the report of the auditors, and the
provisional accounts of the companies, as on 31st March, 2015, had also
been filed.
10. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record
and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and
detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavits. It is claimed by
the petitioners that the proposed Scheme will result in focused approach
towards customers as collective services shall be rendered by a single
consolidated entity; reduction of operating/administrative costs, thereby
improving overall profitability; reduction in number of legal entities and
regulatory compliances thereof; and pooling of financial resources in a
single consolidated entity for effective treasury function and centralized
management of funds to supplement future growth opportunities.
11. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme
provides that ExlService Mauritius Limited is the parent company which
holds the entire paid-up share capital of the transferor company no. 1
(except one share only) and transferee company (except two shares
only) and that the transferor company no. 2 is a wholly owned subsidiary
of the transferee company and the Scheme does not envisage issuances
of any shares to the transferee company. It is further provided that a
lump sum consideration amounting to Rs.1,37,65,500/- has been fixed
for the transfer and vesting of assets and liabilities of the transferor
company no. 1 into the transferee company as a result of amalgamation,
which shall be discharged by the transferee company through issuances
of its 13,76,500 equity shares of Rs.10/- each, credited as fully paid up,
to ExlService Mauritius Limited.
12. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under
Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 or corresponding
provisions under the Companies Act, 2013 are pending against the
petitioner companies.
13. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies
in their separate meetings held on 2nd April, 2015 have unanimously
approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the
Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the
transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.
14. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 111/2015
seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of
convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and
unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 22nd July, 2015, this court
allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of convening
and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders, secured and
unsecured creditors of the transferor and transferee companies, there
being no secured or unsecured creditor of the transferor company no. 2,
to consider and, if thought fit, approve, with or without modification, the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.
15. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition
seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 6th
August, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the
Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations
were also directed to be published in 'Financial Express (English) and
'Jansatta' (Hindi) editions. Affidavit of service has been filed by the
petitioners showing compliance regarding service one the Official
Liquidator and the Regional Director, Northern Region and also regarding
publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 14th October,
2015. Copies of the newspaper clippings containing the publications have
been filed along with the affidavit of service.
16. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought
information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information
received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 7th December,
2015 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint
against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party
interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the
transferor companies do not appear to have been conducted in a manner
prejudicial to the interest of their members, creditors or public interest, as
per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
17. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.
Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate
Affairs has filed his report dated 9th December, 2015. Relying on Clause
9.1 of the Scheme, he has stated that, upon sanction of the Scheme of
Amalgamation, all the employees of the transferor companies shall
become the employees of the transferee company without any break or
interruption in their services. He further submitted that in Clause 6.2 of
the Scheme, it has been stated that the transferee company shall
account the amalgamation of the transferor companies as per the pooling
of interest method. He further submitted that in Clause 13 of the Scheme,
it has been stated that upon this scheme becoming effective, the
transferor companies shall stand dissolved without the process of
winding up.
18. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation
from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavit dated 8th
December, 2015 of Mr. Dhritiman Bhattacharyya, counsel of the
petitioner companies, have submitted that the petitioner companies have
not received any objection pursuant to the citations published in the
newspapers on 14th October, 2015.
19. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders and
creditors of the petitioner companies to the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation and the affidavits filed by the Official Liquidator and the
Regional Director, Northern Region not raising any objection to the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment
to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently,
sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under
Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner
companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with
law. Certified copy of this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies
within 30 days. It is also clarified that this order will not be construed as
an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in
accordance with law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the
appointed date of Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2015, the transferor
companies no. 1 & 2 shall stand dissolved without undergoing the
process of winding up.
20. The Assistant Registrar of Companies appearing for the Regional
Director prays that costs of at least Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the
petitioners keeping in view the fact that the matter has involved
examination of extensive records and also prioritized hearings. Learned
counsel for the petitioner companies states that the same is acceptable
to him. As already directed vide order dated 04.05.2016, the petitioners
shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by way of costs with the Common
Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.
21. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
Dasti.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
May 30, 2016
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!