Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ansal Infrastructure Developers ... vs --
2016 Latest Caselaw 1846 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 1846 Del
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2016

Delhi High Court
Ansal Infrastructure Developers ... vs -- on 8 March, 2016
Author: Rajiv Shakdher
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+      CO.APPL. (M) 36/2016

       IN THE MATTER OF
       ANSAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS LIMITED
                    .... Applicant No.1/ Transferor Company No.1

                        AND

       ANSAL MULTIPRODUCTS (SEZ) LIMITED
                    .... Applicant No.2/ Transferor Company No.2

                        AND

       ANSAL TOWNSHIP DEVELOPERS LIMITED
                   .... Applicant No.3/ Transferor Company No.3

                        AND

       ANSAL URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS LIMITED
                    .... Applicant No.4/ Transferor Company No.4

                        AND

       API INDIA REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED
                     .... Applicant No.5/ Transferor Company No.5

                        AND

       CORTEX PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED
                    .... Applicant No.6/ Transferor Company No.6

                        AND




CO.APPL. (M) 36/2016                                      Page 1 of 5
        MENU EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED
                   .... Applicant No.7/ Transferor Company No.7

                        AND

       MESMERIC PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED
                    .... Applicant No.8/ Transferor Company No.8

                        AND

       PARISAR REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED
                    .... Applicant No.9/ Transferor Company No.9

                        AND

       VISHNU REAL ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED
                    .... Applicant No.10/ Transferor Company No.10

                        WITH

       BRAJA DHAM CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED
                       .... Applicant No.11/Transferee Company

                               Through: Mr Deepak Diwan, Adv.

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

                        ORDER

% 08.03.2016

1. This is a first motion (joint) application filed by Ansal Infrastructure Developers Limited (applicant no.1/transferor company no.1) and Ansal

Multiproducts (SEZ) Limited (applicant no.2/ transferor company no.2) and Ansal Township Developers Limited(applicant no.3/ transferor company no.3) and Ansal-Urban Infrastructure Developers Limited (applicant no.4/ transferor company no.4) and API India Realty Private Limited (applicant no.5/ transferor company no.5) and Cortex Properties Private Limited (applicant no.6/ transferor company no.6) and Menu Exports Private Limited (applicant no.7/ transferor company no.7) and Mesmeric Properties Private Limited (applicant no.8/ transferor company no.8) and Parisar Realtors Private Limited (applicant no.9/ transferor company no.9) and Vishnu Real Estates Private Limited (applicant no.10/ transferor company no.10)with Braja Dham Construction Private Limited (applicant no.11/transferee company) (hereafter collectively referred to as the applicants) under section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (in short the Act) for approval of the scheme of amalgamation (hereafter referred to as the scheme).A copy of the scheme is enclosed with the application.

2. The registered office of the applicants are located in Delhi and, therefore, within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court.

3. The details with respect to the applicants authorised, issued, subscribed and paid up capital are set out in part 2 of the scheme. 3.1 Copies of Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as the latest audited annual accounts as on 31.03.2015 of the applicants have been filed.

4. The scheme has been approved by the Board of Directors (BOD) of the applicants. Copies of the BOD resolution of even date i.e. 30.01.2016 have been filed.

5. The applicants aver that there that there are no proceedings pending against them, under Sections 235 to 251 of the Act.

6. The position with regard to equity shareholders and creditors (i.e. secured) of the applicants, is as follows:

Company No. of Consent given No. of Consent given Shareholders Unsecured Creditors Transferor 7 ALL 1 ALL Company no.1 Transferor 7 ALL NIL NA Company no.2 Transferor 7 ALL 2 ALL Company no.3

Transferor 7 ALL NIL NA Company no.4

Transferor 4 ALL 1 ALL Company no.5 Transferor 2 ALL 1 ALL Company no.6 Transferor 2 ALL 4 ALL Company no.7 Transferor 2 ALL NIL NA Company no.8 Transferor 8 ALL 2 ALL Company no.9 Transferor 3 ALL 2 ALL Company no.10 Transferee 5 ALL NIL NA Company

7. As would be evident upon reading of the aforementioned table, it is clear that consents have been obtained by the above mentioned class of persons/entities.

7.1 Accordingly, the prayer made for dispensing with the requirement of convening meetings of the shareholders and unsecured creditors is dispensed with.

7.2. Further, it is noted that the applicants do not have any secured creditors, so there is no requirement of convening meeting with respect to that class of creditors.

8. The joint application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

9. Dasti.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J MARCH 08, 2016

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter