Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gi Executive Solutions Private ... vs ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 4857 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4857 Del
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2016

Delhi High Court
Gi Executive Solutions Private ... vs ... on 27 July, 2016
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
                  COMPANY PETITION NO. 750/2015

                                            Reserved on 20th May, 2016
                                Date of pronouncement: 27th July, 2016
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):

And

Petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956

Scheme of Amalgamation of:

GI Executive Solutions Private Limited
                                     Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 1

GI Human Resources and Services Private Limited
                                Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 2
     WITH

Elixir Web Solutions Private Limited
                                          Petitioner/Transferee Company

                               Through Mr. Saurabh Kalia, Advocate
                               for the petitioners
                               Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Asstt. Registrar
                               of Companies for the Regional Director

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the

Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction of

the Scheme of Amalgamation of GI Executive Solutions Private Limited

(hereinafter referred to as the transferor company No. 1) and GI Human

Resources and Services Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the

transferor company No. 2) with Elixir Web Solutions Private Limited

(hereinafter referred to as the transferee company).

2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies

are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. The transferor company no. 1 was incorporated under the

Companies Act, 1956 on 21st December, 2010 with the Registrar of

Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

4. The transferor company no. 2 was incorporated under the

Companies Act, 1956 on 9th February, 2009 with the Registrar of

Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

5. The transferee company was incorporated under the Companies

Act, 1956 on 9th April, 2007 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of

Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

6. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company

no.1 is Rs.1,00,000/- divided into 10,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is

Rs.1,00,000/- divided into 10,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

7. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company

no.2 is Rs.20,00,00,000/- divided into 2,00,00,000 equity shares of

Rs.10/- each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the

company is Rs.19,99,83,300/- divided into 1,99,98,330 equity shares of

Rs.10/- each.

8. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is

Rs.40,00,00,000/- divided into 4,00,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is

Rs.37,40,00,000/- divided into 3,74,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

9. Copies of Memorandum and Articles of Association of the

transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record with the

joint application, being CA(M) 141/2015, earlier filed by the petitioners.

The audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2014, of the transferor and

transferee companies had also been filed.

10. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record

and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and

detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is claimed by

the petitioners that the proposed amalgamation would result in greater

efficiency in resource management, cost savings resulting from

rationalization, standardization and simplification of business processes.

It is further claimed that the proposed amalgamation would result in

improved organizational capability arising from pooling of financial,

managerial and technical resources and will also maximize the overall

shareholders value by strengthening its core competencies.

11. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme

provides that, upon coming into effect of this Scheme, the transferee

company shall issue and allot equity shares to the shareholders of the

transferor company no. 2 in the following ratio:-

"01 fully paid up equity share of Rs.10/- each of the transferee company for every 09 fully paid up equity shares of Rs.10/- each held by the shareholders in the transferor company no.2."

It has been further provided that since the transferor company

no.1 is a wholly owned subsidiary of the transferee company, no

consideration shall be payable by the transferee company pursuant to

the amalgamation and the investment in the transferor company no. 1

held by the transferee company would stand cancelled.

12. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under

Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 and/or Sections 206 to

229 of the Companies Act, 2013 are pending against the petitioner

companies.

13. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies

in their separate meetings held on 15th May, 2015 have unanimously

approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the

Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the

transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.

14. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 141/2015

seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of

convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and

unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the

Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 11th September, 2015 this

court allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of

convening and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders of the

transferor and transferee companies, there being no secured or

unsecured creditors of the petitioner companies, to consider and, if

thought fit, approve, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme

of Amalgamation.

15. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition

seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 6th

October, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the

Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations

were also directed to be published in 'Business Standard' (English) and

(Hindi) Delhi editions. Affidavit of service has been filed by the petitioners

showing compliance regarding service on the Official Liquidator and the

Regional Director, Northern Region and also regarding publication of

citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 28th November, 2015. Copies of

the newspaper clippings containing the publications have been filed

along with the said affidavit.

16. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought

information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information

received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 5th February,

2016 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint

against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party

interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the

transferor companies do not appear to have been conducted in a manner

prejudicial to the interest of their members, creditors or public interest, as

per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.

17. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.

Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate

Affairs has filed his report dated 5th February, 2016 stating that he has no

objection to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.

18. The Regional Director has not raised any objection to the proposed

Scheme. But in response to his observation made in para 7 of his report

regarding the foreign/non-residents having interest/shares in the

petitioner companies, the petitioner companies in the affidavit dated 5th

February, 2016 of Mr. Asim Handa, Director of the petitioner companies,

have stated that they shall comply with the provisions of Foreign

Exchange Management Act and other applicable laws, if any, with regard

to the said shareholding.

19. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation

from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavit dated 17th

May, 2016 of Mr. Asim Handa, Director of the petitioner companies have

submitted that neither the petitioner companies nor their counsel have

received any objection pursuant to the citations published in the

newspapers on 28th November, 2015.

20. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders of

the petitioner companies, there being no creditors of the petitioner

companies, to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation and the affidavits

filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region and the Official Liquidator

not raising any objection to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation,

there appears to be no impediment to the grant of sanction to the

Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to

the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the

Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner companies will comply with the

statutory requirements in accordance with law. Certified copy of this order

be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days. It is also clarified

that this order will not be construed as an order granting exemption from

payment of stamp duty as payable in accordance with law. Upon the

sanction becoming effective from the appointed date of Amalgamation,

i.e. 1st April, 2014, the transferor companies no. 1 & 2 shall stand

dissolved without undergoing the process of winding up.

21. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at

least Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioners keeping in view the

fact that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and

also prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner company

states that the same is acceptable to him. As already directed vide order

dated 20.05.2016, the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by

way of costs with the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.

22. The petition is allowed in the above terms.

Dasti.

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

July 27, 2016

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter