Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4630 Del
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMPANY PETITION NO. 946/2015
Reserved on 10th May, 2016
Date of pronouncement: 19th July, 2016
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Petition under Sections 391, 392 & 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956
Scheme of Amalgamation of:
T J Commodities Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 1
TJS Agro Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 2
Jai Ganga Dal & Roller Flour Mills Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 3
Satish Foods Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 4
WITH
Indo European Agro Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferee Company
Through Mr. Rishi Sood, Advocate for
the petitioners
Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Asstt. Registrar
of Companies for the Regional Director
Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the
Official Liquidator
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391, 392 & 394 of
the Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction
of the Scheme of Amalgamation of T J Commodities Private Limited
(hereinafter referred to as the transferor company no. 1); TJS Agro
Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company no. 2);
Jai Ganga Dal & Roller Flour Mills Private Limited (hereinafter referred to
as the transferor company no. 3) and Satish Foods Private Limited
(hereinafter referred to as the transferor company no. 4) with Indo
European Agro Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferee
company).
2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies
are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.
3. The transferor company no. 1 was incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 12th October, 2006 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
4. The transferor company no. 2 was incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 27th May, 2008 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
5. The transferor company no. 3 was originally incorporated under
the Companies Act, 1956 on 1st March, 2007 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi under the name and
style of Disney Realtors Private Limited. The company changed its name
to Jai Ganga Dal & Roller Flour Mills Private Limited and obtained the
fresh certificate of incorporation on 31st May, 2011.
6. The transferor company no. 4 was originally incorporated under
the Companies Act, 1956 on 20th March, 2007 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi under the name and
style of Disney Projects Private Limited. The company changed its name
to Satish Foods Private Limited and obtained the fresh certificate of
incorporation on 27th May, 2011.
7. The transferee company was originally incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 18th May, 1992 with the Registrar of
Companies, Punjab, H. P. & Chandigarh at Jalandhar under the name
and style of Indo-European Agro Limited. The company shifted its
registered office from the Union Territory of Chandigarh to NCT of Delhi
and obtained a certificate in this regard from the Registrar of Companies,
NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi on 22nd July, 2003. Thereafter, the
company changed its name to Indo-European Agro Private Limited and
obtained the fresh certificate of incorporation on 7th October, 2004.
8. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.1 is Rs.1,00,00,000/- divided into 10,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-
each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company
is Rs.60,00,000/- divided into 6,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
9. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.2 is Rs.1,40,00,000/- divided into 14,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-
each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company
is Rs.74,30,000/- divided into 7,43,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
10. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.3 is Rs.2,70,00,000/- divided into 27,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-
each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company
is Rs.2,09,50,000/- divided into 20,95,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
11. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.4 is Rs.1,60,00,000/- divided into 16,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-
each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company
is Rs.1,06,00,000/- divided into 10,60,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
12. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is
Rs.2,00,00,000/- divided into 20,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is
Rs.1,10,00,000/- divided into 11,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
13. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the
transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record with the
joint application, being CA(M) 168/2015, earlier filed by the petitioners.
The audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2015, along with the
reports of the auditors, of the transferor and transferee companies had
also been filed.
14. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record
and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and
detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is claimed by
the petitioners that the Scheme of Amalgamation will result in
establishment of a larger company with large resources, larger capital
base, greater capacity to raise funds for expansion, modernization and
development of the businesses of the companies concerned. It is further
claimed that the proposed amalgamation will enable the undertakings
and businesses of the said companies to obtain greater facilities
possessed and enjoyed by one large company for securing and
conducting its business on favourable terms and other benefits.
15. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme
provides that, upon coming into effect of this Scheme, the transferee
company shall issue and allot equity shares to the shareholders of the
transferor companies in the following ratio:
"01 equity share of Rs.10/- each fully paid up of the transferee company for every 1.34 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up held by the shareholders in the transferor company no. 1. Fraction of shares, if any, will be paid in cash."
"01 equity share of Rs.10/- each fully paid up of the transferee company for every 0.87 equity share of Rs.10/- each fully paid up held by the shareholders in the transferor company no. 3. Fraction of shares, if any, will be paid in cash."
"01 equity share of Rs.10/- each fully paid up of the transferee company for every 0.65 equity share of Rs.10/- each fully paid up held by the shareholders in the transferor company no. 4. Fraction of shares, if any, will be paid in cash."
It has been further submitted that since 100% shareholding of
transferor company no. 2 is held by the transferee company, transferor
company no. 1, transferor company no. 3 and transferor company no. 4,
therefore, the transferee company shall not issue any share to the
shareholders of the transferor company no. 2.
16. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under
Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the
petitioner companies.
17. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies
in their separate meetings held on 30th June, 2015 have unanimously
approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the
Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the
transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.
18. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 168/2015
seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of
convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and
unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 16th November, 2015 this
court allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of
convening and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders and
secured creditors of the transferor companies no. 1 & 2, equity
shareholders of the transferor companies no. 3 & 4 and equity
shareholders, secured and unsecured creditors of the transferee
company, there being no unsecured creditors of the transferor companies
no. 1 & 2 and no secured or unsecured creditors of the transferor
companies no. 3 & 4, to consider and, if thought fit, approve, with or
without modification, the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.
19. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition
seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 11th
December, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the
Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations
were also directed to be published in 'Business Standard' (English) and
(Hindi) editions. Affidavit of service has been filed by the petitioners
showing compliance regarding service on the Official Liquidator and the
Regional Director (Northern Region) and also regarding publication of
citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 3rd March, 2016. Copies of the
newspaper clippings containing the publications have been filed along
with the said affidavit.
20. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought
information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information
received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 1st April, 2016
wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint against the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party interested in
the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the transferor
companies do not appear to have been conducted in a manner
prejudicial to the interest of their members, creditors or public interest, as
per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
21. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.
Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate
Affairs has filed his report dated 6th April, 2016 stating that the ROC in his
report has not made any adverse comments against the Scheme of
Amalgamation and that the Regional Director has no objection to the
proposed Scheme.
22. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation
from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavit dated 29th
March, 2016 of Mr. Satish Kumar, director of the petitioner companies
have submitted that the petitioner companies have not received any
objection pursuant to the citations published in the newspapers on 3rd
March, 2016.
23. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders and
creditors of the petitioner companies to the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation and the affidavits filed by the Regional Director, Northern
Region and the Official Liquidator not raising any objection to the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment
to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently,
sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under
Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner
companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with
law. Certified copy of this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies
within 30 days. It is also clarified that this order will not be construed as
an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in
accordance with law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the
appointed date of Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2015, the transferor
companies no. 1 to 4 shall stand dissolved without undergoing the
process of winding up.
24. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at
least Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioners keeping in view the
fact that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and
also prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner company
states that the same is acceptable to him. As already directed vide order
dated 10.05.2016, the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by
way of costs with the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.
25. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
Dasti.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
July 19, 2016
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!