Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4438 Del
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2016
$~7.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 645/2014
YASHPAL GOSAIN ..... Plaintiff
Through: None
versus
NAND KISHORE GOSAIN AND ORS ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Virender Mehta, Advocate for D-1
and D-2.
Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, Advocate and
Mr. Iqbal Singh, Advocate for D-3 to D-6.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 11.07.2016
1. A perusal of the order sheets shows that none has been appearing for the plaintiff for the past several dates. In fact, the plaintiff was last represented before the learned Joint Registrar on 25.03.2015, whereafter both, the counsel and the plaintiff have absented themselves.
2. On the last date of hearing, the statement of the counsels for the defendants No.1 and 2 and defendants No.3 to 6 was recorded to the effect that the parties were in the process of arriving at a settlement. Today, counsels for the defendants No.1 and 2 and defendants No.3 to 6 state that efforts were made for negotiating a settlement but the same did not succeed.
3. Be that as it may. As none has been appearing for the plaintiff for the past several dates in the present suit, it is assumed that he does not wish to pursue the present suit, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
HIMA KOHLI, J JULY 11, 2016 rkb/ap
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!