Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinod Singh & Ors. vs State (Nct Of Delhi) &Anr.;
2016 Latest Caselaw 696 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 696 Del
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2016

Delhi High Court
Vinod Singh & Ors. vs State (Nct Of Delhi) &Anr.; on 29 January, 2016
26
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                           Date of decision: 29th January, 2016

W.P.(CRL) 267/2016 & CRL.M.A. 1515/2016

VINOD SINGH & ORS.                                                ..... Petitioners

                            Through:      Mr Kamal Mehta, Advocate.

                            versus



STATE (NCT OF DELHI) &ANR.                                      ..... Respondents

Through: Mr Sanjay Lao, Addl. Standing Counsel (Crl.) with SI Kunal Kishor, PS- Harsh Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)

1. The present is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking

quashing of FIR No.0249/2013 under Sections 323/308/34 IPC registered at

Police Station- Harsh Vihar, Delhi.

2. The subject FIR came to be registered as a consequence of a scuffle

between the petitioners and the complainant Kamlesh Choudhary @ Raja

Prasad due to some misunderstanding, wherein the complainant allegedly

received injuries

3. The complainant, who is present in court, states that the

misunderstanding that led to the registration of the subject FIR, has been

resolved by and between the parties and the parties have entered into a

compromise deed dated 24.12.2015. The salient terms of the aforesaid

compromise-cum-settlement deed dated 24.12.2015 are as follows:-

"1. That it is agreed between the parties that they have settled their disputes amicably and the first party has agreed to withdraw the above said F.I.R. F.I.R. bearing no.0249/2013 on 14.12.2013 under section 323/308/34 IPC in P.S. Harsh Vihar

2. That it has been further agreed between both the parties that both the parties take all appropriate/necessary steps and to coordinate to each other for quashing of the above said F.I.R. as mentioned above.

3. That both the parties of the deed settled their disputes amicably with the intervention of respectable persons of the society and agreed to take back or quash the F.I.R. as mentioned above and made and signed this compromise Deed without any force, coercion, pressure or undue influence from any side or corner.

4. That it has been further agreed between the parties that they will not initiate any proceedings against each other on the same cause of action due to which the above said F.I.R. were registered in

future. It has been further agreed between the parties that this Compromise Deed may be filed or given to the competent authority and competent court of law where it is necessary to be filed to quash the F.I.R. bearing no. 0249/2013 as mentioned above.

5. That the above Compromise between the parties and the decision to take back or quash the above F.I.R. as mentioned above has been made out of their independent free will and violation and without any pressure, force, fraud, coercion or undue influence from either side or by any third person.

6. That the first party and the Second party have set their respective hands unto this deed after having fully understood the contents hereinbefore which have fully been read over and explained to them in vernacular in the presence of the respectable persons of the society, family members, well wiser and witnesses and the same shall be binding upon both the parties.

7. That the first party having no objection if the above said FIR will be quashed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi.

8. That both the parties have agreed to be bound with this compromise Deed and shall not turned down from their words/statements in future."

4. Kamlesh Choudhary @ Raja Prasad, the complainant, who is present

in court and has been identified by the IO in the subject FIR, namely, SI

Kunal Kishor, PS- Harsh Vihar, states that in view of the foresaid

compromise deed dated 24.12.2015 he is no longer keen to proceed with the

subject FIR.

5. In view of the foregoing, since the misunderstanding that led to the

registration of the subject FIR has been amicably resolved by and between

the parties without any undue influence, pressure or coercion, no useful

purpose will be served by proceeding with the subject FIR and the

proceedings arising therefrom.

6. Resultantly, the FIR No.0249/2013 under Sections 323/308/34 IPC

registered at Police Station- Harsh Vihar, Delhi, is hereby set aside and

quashed qua the petitioners subject to their maintaining good behaviour for a

period of two years from today.

7. With the above said directions, the writ petition is allowed and

disposed of accordingly.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J JANUARY 29, 2016 mk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter