Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 1442 Del
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2016
#42
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 23.02.2016
W.P.(CRL) 600/2016
SONU @ AMARJEET ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. D.V. Khatri, Advocate
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, APP with ASI Ramesh Chand, PS- Narela for R-1 Respondent No.2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)
1. The present is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.)
seeking quashing of FIR No.0977/2015, under Sections 408/506 IPC,
registered at Police Station- Narela, Delhi and the proceedings emanating
therefrom.
2. The facts in brief are that the subject FIR came to be registered on an
allegation made by the complainant Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal (respondent
No.2) that his employee Sonu @ Amarjeet (petitioner herein) who had been
engaged to supervise a Gaushala owned by him, was not permitting him to
enter the Gaushala and extending threats to him in that behalf.
3. Counsel for the parties, on instructions from the parties, who are
present in person in Court and have been identified by the IO ASI Ramesh
Chand, Police Station- Narela, state that with the intervention and help of
respectable persons of the society, the dispute has been amicably resolved.
Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal, the complainant herein, has now recovered
possession of Shri Krishna Gaushala (subsequently named as 'Shri Ram
Gaushala' by the petitioner herein) owned by him as well as the subject
vehicle.
4. In view of the foregoing, since the dispute which resulted in the
registration of the subject FIR has already been resolved amicably by the
parties without any undue influence, pressure or coercion, no useful purpose
will be served by proceeding with the subject FIR and the proceedings
arising therefrom.
5. Consequently, FIR No.0977/2015, under Sections 408/506 IPC,
registered at Police Station- Narela, Delhi and the proceedings emanating
therefrom are hereby set aside and quashed qua the petitioner.
6. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
7. No costs.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J FEBRUARY 23, 2016 dn
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!