Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Psb Properties Private Limited vs ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 1273 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 1273 Del
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2016

Delhi High Court
Psb Properties Private Limited vs ... on 18 February, 2016
Author: Sudershan Kumar Misra
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
                  COMPANY PETITION NO. 404/2015

                                       Reserved on 5th January, 2016
                         Date /of pronouncement: 18th February, 2016
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):

And

Petition under Section 391(2) & 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956

Scheme of Amalgamation of:

PSB Properties Private Limited
                                       Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 1

Sonastar Electronics Private Limited
                                       Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 2
      WITH

Parkwood Infrastructure Private Limited
                                            Petitioner/Transferee Company

                                 Through Mr. Amit Goel, Advocate for
                                 the petitioners
                                 Ms.     Aparna     Mudiam, Assistant
                                 Registrar of Companies for the
                                 Regional Director
                                 Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the
                                 Official Liquidator

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391(2) & 394 of

the Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction

of the Scheme of Amalgamation of PSB Properties Private Limited

(hereinafter referred to as the transferor company no. 1) and Sonastar

Electronics Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor

company no. 2) with Parkwood Infrastructure Private Limited (hereinafter

referred to as the transferee company).

2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies

are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. The transferor company no. 1 was incorporated under the

Companies Act, 1956 on 21st May, 1981 with the Registrar of

Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

4. The transferor company no. 2 was incorporated under the

Companies Act, 1956 on 20th June, 1990 with the Registrar of

Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.

5. The transferee company was originally incorporated under the

Companies Act, 1956 on 30th March, 1977 with the Registrar of

Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi under the name and

style of Hemkunt Construction Company Limited. The company changed

its name to Hemkunt Construction Company Private Limited and

obtained a fresh certificate of incorporation on 11th May, 1988. The

company again changed its name to Parkwood Infrastructure Private

Limited and obtained the fresh certificate of incorporation on 3rd April,

2007.

6. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company

no.1 is Rs.5,00,000/- divided into 50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is

Rs.1,03,000/- divided into 10,300 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

7. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company

no.2, is Rs.2,00,000/- divided into 2,000 equity shares of Rs.100/- each.

The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is

Rs.1,00,000/- divided into 1,000 equity shares of Rs.100/- each.

8. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is

Rs.25,00,000/- divided into 2,50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each. The

present issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is

Rs.25,00,000/- divided into 2,50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.

9. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the

transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record along with

CA(M) 92/2015 earlier filed by the petitioners. The audited balance

sheets, as on 31st March, 2014, of the transferor and transferee

companies, along with the report of the auditors, had also been filed.

10. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record

and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and

detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is claimed by

the petitioners that the proposed amalgamation would create greater

synergies between the businesses of the three companies and would

enable them to manage their business more efficiently by effectively

pooling the technical and marketing skills of both the companies as an

integrated entity and also enable effective management and unified

control of operations. It is further claimed that the proposed

amalgamation will result in better administration and cost reduction,

including reduction in administrative and other common costs.

11. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme

provides that, upon coming into effect of this Scheme, the transferee

company shall issue and allot equity shares to the shareholders of the

transferor companies in the following ratio:-

"335 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up of the transferee company for every 100 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up held in the transferor company no. 1."

"2180 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up of the transferee company for every 100 equity shares of Rs.100/- each fully paid up held in the transferor company no. 2."

12. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under

Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the

petitioner companies.

13. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies

in their separate meetings held on 31st January, 2015 have unanimously

approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the

Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the

transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.

14. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 92/2015

seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of

convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and

unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the

Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 25th May, 2015, this court

allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of convening

and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders, secured and

unsecured creditors of the transferor and transferee companies to

consider and, if thought fit, approve, with or without modification, the

proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.

15. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition

seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 6th

July, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the

Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations

were also directed to be published in 'Business Standard' (English) and

(Hindi) editions. An affidavit has been filed by the petitioners showing

compliance regarding publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers

on 16th November, 2015. Copies of the newspaper clippings containing

the publications have been filed along with the affidavit of service.

16. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought

information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information

received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 2nd December,

2015 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint

against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party

interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the

transferor companies do not appear to have been conducted in a manner

prejudicial to the interest of their members, creditors or public interest, as

per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.

17. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.

Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate

Affairs has filed his report dated 4th December, 2015. Relying on Clause

3.2(i) of Part-II of the Scheme, he has stated that, upon sanction of the

Scheme of Amalgamation, all the employees of the transferor companies

shall become the employees of the transferee company without any

break or interruption in their services. He has further submitted that in

Clause 6.1 of Part-II of the Scheme, it has been stated that the transferee

company shall follow the method of accounting as prescribed for the

pooling of interest method under Accounting Standard-14 as notified

under the Companies Accounting Rules, 2006. He further submitted that

in Clause 7 of Part-II of the Scheme, it has been stated that upon this

scheme becoming effective, the transferor companies shall stand

dissolved without the process of winding up.

18. The Regional Director in para 8 of his report has stated that the

transferor company no. 2 has not filed its annual return & balance sheet

for the financial year ended 31.03.2014 thereby prima facie violated the

provisions of Section 137 r/w Section 403 of the Companies Act, 2013. In

response to the above objection, the petitioner companies in the affidavit

dated 11th January, 2016 of Mr. Dakshdeep Singh, Director of the

transferee company, have stated that the transferor company no. 2 had

already filed its annual return for the financial year ending 31.03.2014 on

25th December, 2014. A copy of Form 20B evidencing filing of the annual

report has also been placed on record. So far as the balance sheet of the

transferor company no. 2 for the year ending 31.03.2014 is concerned, it

has been stated that the same has been filed on 5th December, 2015 and

the copies of the Forms 23AC and 23ACA along with challan evidencing

filing of balance sheet have been placed on record. In view of the

aforesaid, the objection raised by the Regional Director stands satisfied.

19. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation

from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavit dated 3rd

December, 2015 of Mr. Dakshdeep Singh, Director of the transferee

company, have submitted that neither the petitioner companies nor their

counsel have received any objection pursuant to the citations published

in the newspapers on 16th November, 2015.

20. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders,

secured and unsecured creditors of the petitioner companies to the

proposed Scheme of Amalgamation; the affidavit filed by the Official

Liquidator not raising any objection to the proposed Scheme of

Amalgamation and there being no surviving objection to the same by the

Regional Director, Northern Region, there appears to be no impediment

to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently,

sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under

Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner

company will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with

law. Certified copy of this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies

within 30 days. It is also clarified that this order will not be construed as

an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in

accordance with law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the

appointed date of Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2014, the transferor

companies no. 1 & 2 shall stand dissolved without undergoing the

process of winding up.

21. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at

least Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioners keeping in view the

fact that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and

also prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner companies

states that the same is acceptable to him. As already directed vide order

dated 05.01.2016, the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by

way of costs with the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.

22. The petition is allowed in the above terms.

Dasti.

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

February 18, 2016

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter