Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 1273 Del
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMPANY PETITION NO. 404/2015
Reserved on 5th January, 2016
Date /of pronouncement: 18th February, 2016
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Petition under Section 391(2) & 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956
Scheme of Amalgamation of:
PSB Properties Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 1
Sonastar Electronics Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 2
WITH
Parkwood Infrastructure Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferee Company
Through Mr. Amit Goel, Advocate for
the petitioners
Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Assistant
Registrar of Companies for the
Regional Director
Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the
Official Liquidator
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391(2) & 394 of
the Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction
of the Scheme of Amalgamation of PSB Properties Private Limited
(hereinafter referred to as the transferor company no. 1) and Sonastar
Electronics Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor
company no. 2) with Parkwood Infrastructure Private Limited (hereinafter
referred to as the transferee company).
2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies
are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.
3. The transferor company no. 1 was incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 21st May, 1981 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
4. The transferor company no. 2 was incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 20th June, 1990 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
5. The transferee company was originally incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 30th March, 1977 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi under the name and
style of Hemkunt Construction Company Limited. The company changed
its name to Hemkunt Construction Company Private Limited and
obtained a fresh certificate of incorporation on 11th May, 1988. The
company again changed its name to Parkwood Infrastructure Private
Limited and obtained the fresh certificate of incorporation on 3rd April,
2007.
6. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.1 is Rs.5,00,000/- divided into 50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is
Rs.1,03,000/- divided into 10,300 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
7. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.2, is Rs.2,00,000/- divided into 2,000 equity shares of Rs.100/- each.
The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is
Rs.1,00,000/- divided into 1,000 equity shares of Rs.100/- each.
8. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is
Rs.25,00,000/- divided into 2,50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each. The
present issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is
Rs.25,00,000/- divided into 2,50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
9. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the
transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record along with
CA(M) 92/2015 earlier filed by the petitioners. The audited balance
sheets, as on 31st March, 2014, of the transferor and transferee
companies, along with the report of the auditors, had also been filed.
10. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record
and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and
detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is claimed by
the petitioners that the proposed amalgamation would create greater
synergies between the businesses of the three companies and would
enable them to manage their business more efficiently by effectively
pooling the technical and marketing skills of both the companies as an
integrated entity and also enable effective management and unified
control of operations. It is further claimed that the proposed
amalgamation will result in better administration and cost reduction,
including reduction in administrative and other common costs.
11. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme
provides that, upon coming into effect of this Scheme, the transferee
company shall issue and allot equity shares to the shareholders of the
transferor companies in the following ratio:-
"335 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up of the transferee company for every 100 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up held in the transferor company no. 1."
"2180 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up of the transferee company for every 100 equity shares of Rs.100/- each fully paid up held in the transferor company no. 2."
12. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under
Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the
petitioner companies.
13. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies
in their separate meetings held on 31st January, 2015 have unanimously
approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the
Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the
transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.
14. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 92/2015
seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of
convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and
unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 25th May, 2015, this court
allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of convening
and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders, secured and
unsecured creditors of the transferor and transferee companies to
consider and, if thought fit, approve, with or without modification, the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.
15. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition
seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 6th
July, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the
Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations
were also directed to be published in 'Business Standard' (English) and
(Hindi) editions. An affidavit has been filed by the petitioners showing
compliance regarding publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers
on 16th November, 2015. Copies of the newspaper clippings containing
the publications have been filed along with the affidavit of service.
16. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought
information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information
received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 2nd December,
2015 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint
against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party
interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the
transferor companies do not appear to have been conducted in a manner
prejudicial to the interest of their members, creditors or public interest, as
per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
17. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.
Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate
Affairs has filed his report dated 4th December, 2015. Relying on Clause
3.2(i) of Part-II of the Scheme, he has stated that, upon sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation, all the employees of the transferor companies
shall become the employees of the transferee company without any
break or interruption in their services. He has further submitted that in
Clause 6.1 of Part-II of the Scheme, it has been stated that the transferee
company shall follow the method of accounting as prescribed for the
pooling of interest method under Accounting Standard-14 as notified
under the Companies Accounting Rules, 2006. He further submitted that
in Clause 7 of Part-II of the Scheme, it has been stated that upon this
scheme becoming effective, the transferor companies shall stand
dissolved without the process of winding up.
18. The Regional Director in para 8 of his report has stated that the
transferor company no. 2 has not filed its annual return & balance sheet
for the financial year ended 31.03.2014 thereby prima facie violated the
provisions of Section 137 r/w Section 403 of the Companies Act, 2013. In
response to the above objection, the petitioner companies in the affidavit
dated 11th January, 2016 of Mr. Dakshdeep Singh, Director of the
transferee company, have stated that the transferor company no. 2 had
already filed its annual return for the financial year ending 31.03.2014 on
25th December, 2014. A copy of Form 20B evidencing filing of the annual
report has also been placed on record. So far as the balance sheet of the
transferor company no. 2 for the year ending 31.03.2014 is concerned, it
has been stated that the same has been filed on 5th December, 2015 and
the copies of the Forms 23AC and 23ACA along with challan evidencing
filing of balance sheet have been placed on record. In view of the
aforesaid, the objection raised by the Regional Director stands satisfied.
19. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation
from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavit dated 3rd
December, 2015 of Mr. Dakshdeep Singh, Director of the transferee
company, have submitted that neither the petitioner companies nor their
counsel have received any objection pursuant to the citations published
in the newspapers on 16th November, 2015.
20. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders,
secured and unsecured creditors of the petitioner companies to the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation; the affidavit filed by the Official
Liquidator not raising any objection to the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation and there being no surviving objection to the same by the
Regional Director, Northern Region, there appears to be no impediment
to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently,
sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under
Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner
company will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with
law. Certified copy of this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies
within 30 days. It is also clarified that this order will not be construed as
an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in
accordance with law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the
appointed date of Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2014, the transferor
companies no. 1 & 2 shall stand dissolved without undergoing the
process of winding up.
21. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at
least Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioners keeping in view the
fact that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and
also prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner companies
states that the same is acceptable to him. As already directed vide order
dated 05.01.2016, the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by
way of costs with the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.
22. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
Dasti.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
February 18, 2016
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!