Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 1262 Del
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMPANY PETITION NO. 213/2015
Reserved on 7th January, 2016
Date of pronouncement: 18th February, 2016
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Petition under Sections 391 & 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956
Scheme of Amalgamation of:
Bali Projects Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 1
Decowel Housing Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 2
Himal Projects & Investments Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 3
WITH
Ramesh Aggarwal & Associates Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferee Company
Through Mr. P. K. Mittal and Mr. M.K.
Sinha, Advocates for the petitioners
Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Assistant
Registrar of Companies for the
Regional Director
Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the
Official Liquidator
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391 & 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction of
the Scheme of Amalgamation of Bali Projects Private Limited (hereinafter
referred to as the transferor company no. 1); Decowel Housing Private
Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company no. 2); and
Himal Projects & Investments Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as
the transferor company no. 3) with Ramesh Aggarwal & Associates
Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferee company).
2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies
are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.
3. The transferor company no. 1 was incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 11th July, 1994 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
4. The transferor company no. 2 was incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 11th July, 2000 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
5. The transferor company no. 3 was incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 2nd August, 1995 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
6. The transferee company was incorporated under the Companies
Act, 1956 on 5th March, 1992 with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of
Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
7. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.1 is Rs.15,00,000/- divided into 1,50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-
each. The present issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the
company is Rs.9,60,000/- divided into 96,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-
each fully paid up.
8. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.2 is Rs.40,00,000/- divided into 4,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-
each. The present issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the
company is Rs.39,02,000/- divided into 3,90,200 equity shares of Rs.10/-
each fully paid up.
9. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.3 is Rs.70,00,000/- divided into 70,000 equity shares of Rs.100/-
each. The present issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the
company is Rs.68,82,000/- divided into 68,820 equity shares of Rs.100/-
each fully paid up.
10. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is
Rs.3,00,00,000/- divided into 30,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
The present issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the
company is Rs.3,00,00,000/- divided into 30,00,000 equity shares of
Rs.10/- each fully paid up.
11. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the
transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record with the
joint application, being CA(M) 38/2015, earlier filed by the petitioners.
The audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2014, of the transferor
and transferee companies, along with the report of the auditors, had also
been filed.
12. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record
and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and
detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is submitted by
the petitioners that the shareholders of the transferor and transferee
companies are almost common. It is claimed that the Scheme will result
in pooling of their financial, commercial and other resources, economies
of scales and reduction of overheads. It is further claimed that with
enhanced capabilities and resources at its disposal, the transferee
company will have greater flexibility and strength to meet requirements
for further growth of business activities.
13. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme
provides that, upon coming into effect of this Scheme, the transferee
company shall issue and allot equity shares to the shareholders of the
transferor companies in the following ratio:-
"01 equity share of Rs.10/- each of the transferee company, credited as fully paid up, for every 2.5 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up held in the transferor company no. 1."
"01 equity shares of Rs.10/- each of the transferee company, credited as fully paid up, for every 02 equity shares of Rs.10/- each fully paid up held in the transferor company no. 2."
"07 equity shares of Rs.10/- each of the transferee company, credited as fully paid up, for every 01 equity share of Rs.100/- each fully paid up held in the transferor company no. 3."
14. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under
Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the
petitioner companies.
15. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies
in their separate meetings held on 16th February, 2015 have unanimously
approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the
Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the
transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.
16. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 38/2015
seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of
convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and
unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 16th April, 2015, this court
allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of convening
and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders of the transferor
companies and equity shareholders and unsecured creditors of the
transferee company, there being no secured or unsecured creditors of
the transferor companies and no secured creditors of the transferee
company, to consider and, if thought fit, approve, with or without
modification, the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation.
17. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition
seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 28th
April, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the
Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations
were also directed to be published in 'Statesman' (English) and 'Veer
Arjun' (Hindi) editions. The petitioners have filed the affidavit showing
compliance regarding publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers
on 14th July, 2015. Copies of the newspaper clippings containing the
publications have been filed along with the said affidavit.
18. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought
information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information
received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 10th November,
2015 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint
against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party
interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the
transferor companies do not appear to have been conducted in a manner
prejudicial to the interest of their members, creditors or public interest, as
per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
19. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.
Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate
Affairs has filed his report dated 20th November, 2015. Relying on Clause
9 of Part-III the Scheme, he has stated that, upon sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation, all the employees of the transferor companies
shall become the employees of the transferee company without any
break or interruption in their services. He has further submitted that in
Clause 6 of Part-III of the Scheme, it has been stated that the transferee
company shall follow the method of accounting as prescribed for the
pooling of interest method under Accounting Standard-14 as notified
under the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006. He further
submitted that in Clause 21.2 of Part-III of the Scheme, it has been stated
that upon this scheme becoming effective, the transferor companies shall
stand dissolved without the process of winding up.
20. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation
from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavit dated 28th
October, 2015 of Mr. Ramesh Aggarwal, Director of the petitioner
companies, have submitted that the petitioner companies have not
received any objection pursuant to the citations published in the
newspapers on 14th July, 2015.
21. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders and
creditors of the petitioner companies to the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation and the affidavits filed by the Regional Director, Northern
Region, and the Official Liquidator not raising any objection to the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment
to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently,
sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under
Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner
companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with
law. Certified copy of this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies
within 30 days. It is also clarified that this order will not be construed as
an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in
accordance with law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the
appointed date of Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2014, the transferor
companies no. 1 to 3 shall stand dissolved without undergoing the
process of winding up.
22. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at
least Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioners keeping in view the
fact that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and
also prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner companies
states that the same is acceptable to him. As already directed vide order
dated 07.01.2016, the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by
way of costs with the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.
23. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
Dasti.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
February 18, 2016
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!