Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Brewton Consultants Private ... vs --
2016 Latest Caselaw 1059 Del

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 1059 Del
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2016

Delhi High Court
Brewton Consultants Private ... vs -- on 10 February, 2016
Author: Rajiv Shakdher
$~34
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+      CO.APPL.(M) 24/2016
       IN THE MATTER OF
       BREWTON CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED
                    ..... Applicant no. 1/ Transferor Company No.1
              AND
       DACHA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
                   ..... Applicant no.2/ Transferor Company No.2
              AND
       PINKCITY SALES PRIVATE LIMITED
                     ..... Applicant no. 3/ Transferor Company No.3
              AND
       RIVER PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED
                    ..... Applicant no.4 / Transferor Company No.4
              AND
       RSS PETRO CHEM PRIVATE LIMITED
                    ..... Applicant no. 5/ Transferor Company No.5
              AND
       SHIVAM PLASTOCRAFT PRIVATE LIMITED
                    ..... Applicant no.6/ Transferor Company No.6
              AND
       TRUE VALUE PROPMART PRIVATE LIMITED
                    ..... Applicant no. 7/ Transferee Company
                         Through: Mr Mukesh Sukhija, Adv.
       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
               ORDER

% 10.02.2016

1. This is a first motion (joint) application, which is moved by Brewton Consultants Private Limited (Applicant no. 1/ Transferor Company No.1)

Dacha Developers Private Limited (Applicant no. 2/ Transferor Company No.2) Pinkcity Sales Private Limited (Applicant no. 3/ Transferor Company No.3) River Properties Private Limited (Applicant no. 4/ Transferor Company No.4) RSS Petro Chem Private Limited (Applicant no. 4/ Transferor Company No.5) Shivam Plastocraft Private Limited (Applicant no. 6/ Transferor Company No.6) and True Value Propmart Private Limited (Applicant no. 7/ Transferee Company) (hereafter collectively referred to as the applicants) under Section 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (in short the Act) in connection with the proposed scheme of amalgamation (hereafter referred to as the scheme). A copy of the scheme is enclosed with the application.

2. The registered office of the applicants are situate, within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and, therefore, this court has the necessary jurisdiction to deal with the matter.

3. The details of the date of incorporation of the applicants, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up capital have been set out in paragraph 2 of the scheme.

4. The copies of Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as the latest audited annual accounts for the year ended 31.03.2015 of the applicants have been filed.

5. I am informed by the learned counsel for the applicants that no proceedings under Section 235 to 251 of the Act are pending against them as on date.

6. The scheme has been approved by the respective Board of Directors (BOD) of the applicants. The copies of BOD resolution of even date i.e. 14.01.2016 have been filed.

7. The status of the shareholders and unsecured creditors of the applicants and the consent obtained from them (wherever applicable) qua the scheme is set out in the table given below:-

      Company         No.      Of    Consent   No.     Of   Consent
                      Shareholders   given     unsecured    given
                                               creditors
      Transferor      3              All       1            All
      Company No.1
      Transferor      4              All       2            All
      Company No.2
      Transferor      2              All       Nil          N.A.
      Company No.3
      Transferor      2              All       2            All
      Company No.4
      Transferor      2              All       1            All
      Company No.5
      Transferor      2              All       2            All
      Company No.6
      Transferee      2              All       2            All
      Company


8. A prayer has been made to dispense with the requirement of convening the meetings of the shareholders and the creditors (i.e. the unsecured creditors) of the applicants. The letters of consent submitted by the shareholders have been seen and examined. They are found in order. Similarly, letters of consent of unsecured creditors have been seen and found in order.

9. Given the fact that all shareholders and creditors (i.e. the unsecured creditors) of the applicants have given their consent and/or No Objection (NOC) to the scheme, there shall be no requirement to convene their meetings.

10. The application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.

11. Dasti.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J FEBRUARY 10, 2016/kk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter