Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 5337 Del
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMPANY PETITION NO. 447/2014
Reserved on 26th July, 2016
Date of pronouncement: 12th August, 2016
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Petition under Sections 391(2) & 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956
Scheme of Amalgamation of:
ASM Merchandisers Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 1
Shivshambu Traders Private Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 2
WITH
Ikta Aromatics Limited
Petitioner/Transferee Company
Through Mr. Mukesh Sukhija,
Advocate for the petitioners
Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Asstt. Registrar
of Companies for the Regional Director
Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the
Official Liquidator
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391(2) & 394 of
the Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking sanction
of the Scheme of Amalgamation of ASM Merchandisers Private Limited
(hereinafter referred to as the transferor company no. 1) and Shivshambu
Traders Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company
no. 1) with Ikta Aromatics Limited (hereinafter referred to as the
transferee company).
2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies
are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.
3. The transferor company no. 1 was incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 23rd December, 2003 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
4. The transferor company no. 2 was incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 13th May, 2005 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi.
5. The transferee company was originally incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 18th May, 2001 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi under the name and
style of Som Santi F&F Limited. The company changed its name to Ikta
Aromatics Limited and obtained the fresh certificate of incorporation on
2nd February, 2010.
6. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.1 is Rs.25,00,000/- divided into 2,50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-
each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company
is Rs.20,00,000/- divided into 2,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
7. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.2 is Rs.25,00,000/- divided into 2,50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-
each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company
is Rs.20,00,000/- divided into 2,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
8. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is
Rs.1,00,00,000/- divided into 10,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is
Rs.40,10,000/- divided into 4,01,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
9. Copies of Memorandum and Articles of Association of the
transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record with the
joint application, being CA(M) 108/2014, earlier filed by the petitioners.
The audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2013, of the transferor and
transferee companies, along with the report of the auditors, had also
been filed.
10. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on
record and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated
and detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is claimed
that the proposed amalgamation would enable pooling of physical,
financial and human resources of these companies for their most
beneficial utilization in the combined entity. It is further claimed that the
proposed amalgamation will result in usual economies of a centralized
and a large company including elimination of duplicate work, reduction in
overheads, better and more productive utilization of human and other
resources and enhancement of overall business efficiency. It will enable
these companies to combine their managerial and operating strength to
build a wider capital and financial base and to promote and secure
overall growth of their businesses.
11. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme
provides that, upon coming into effect of this Scheme, the transferee
company shall issue and allot equity shares to the shareholders of the
transferor companies in the following ratio:-
"01 equity share of Rs.10/- each of the transferee company for every 01 equity share of Rs.10/- each held in the transferor company no. 1."
"01 equity share of Rs.10/- each of the transferee company for every 01 equity share of Rs.10/- each held in the transferor company no. 2."
12. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under
Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the
petitioner companies.
13. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies
in their separate meetings held on 31st March, 2014 have approved the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the Resolutions passed at
the meetings of the Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee
companies have been placed on record.
14. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 108/2014
seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of
convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and
unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 8th July, 2014, this court
allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of convening
and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders and unsecured
creditors of the transferor and transferee companies, there being no
secured creditor of the petitioner companies, to consider and, if thought
fit, approve, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation.
15. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition
seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 23rd
July, 2014, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the
Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations
were also directed to be published in 'Business Standard' (English) and
(Hindi) editions. Affidavit of service has been filed by the petitioners
showing compliance regarding service on the Regional Director, Northern
Region and the Official Liquidator, and also regarding publication of
citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 18th August, 2014. Copies of the
newspaper clippings containing the publications have been filed along
with the affidavit of service.
16. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought
information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information
received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 26th February,
2016 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint
against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party
interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the
transferor companies do not appear to have been conducted in a manner
prejudicial to the interest of their members, creditors or public interest, as
per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
17. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.
Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate
Affairs has filed his report dated 11th November, 2014. Relying on Clause
8(a) of Part-D of the Scheme, he has stated that, upon sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation, all the employees of the transferor companies
shall become the employees of the transferee company without any
break or interruption in their services. He has further submitted that in
Clause 16(a) of Part-G of the Scheme, it has been stated that
amalgamation shall be an 'amalgamation in the nature of merger' as
defined in Accounting Standard-14 issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India and shall be accounted for under the 'pooling of
interest' method in accordance with the said AS-14. He further submitted
that in Clause 10 of Part-E of the Scheme, it has been stated that upon
this scheme becoming effective, the transferor companies shall stand
dissolved without the process of winding up.
18. Although no objection has been raised by the Regional Director to
the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation but in Para 10 of his report, he
has stated that the transferee company may be asked about compliance
of Section 295 of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of loan given to
both the transferor companies. The petitioner companies in the affidavit
dated 21st March, 2015 of Mr. Raja Varshney, Director of the transferee
company, have undertaken to file the necessary compounding
application for compliance of the provisions of Section 295 of the
Companies Act, 1956. The undertaking given by the transferee company
is accepted. In case of any default by the company, the ROC is at liberty
to take appropriate proceedings, as permissible in law, against the
transferee company.
19. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation
from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavits dated 9th
October, 2014 of Sh. Shyama Charan Varshney, Director of the
transferor company no. 1; Mr. Sanjay Varshney, Director of the transferor
company no. 2 and Mr. Raja Varshney, Director of the transferee
company, have submitted that neither the petitioner companies nor their
counsel have received any objection pursuant to the citations published
in the newspapers on 18th August, 2014.
20. Considering the approval accorded by the shareholders and
creditors of the petitioner companies to the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation and the affidavits filed by the Regional Director, Northern
Region, and the Official Liquidator not raising any objection to the
proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment
to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently,
sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under
Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner
companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with
law. Certified copy of this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies
within 30 days. It is also clarified that this order will not be construed as
an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in
accordance with law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the
appointed date of Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2013, the transferor
companies no. 1 and 2 shall stand dissolved without undergoing the
process of winding up.
21. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at
least Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioners keeping in view the
fact that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and
also prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner companies
states that the same is acceptable to him. As already directed vide order
dated 07.12.2015, the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- by
way of costs with the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator.
22. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
Dasti.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
August 12, 2016
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!