Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Zf Components Investment Private ... vs ...
2015 Latest Caselaw 7176 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 7176 Del
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2015

Delhi High Court
Zf Components Investment Private ... vs ... on 21 September, 2015
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
                  COMPANY PETITION NO. 275/2015
                                         Reserved on 18th August, 2015
                           Date of pronouncement: 21st September, 2015
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):

And

Petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956

Scheme of Amalgamation of:
ZF Components Investment Private Limited
                                       Petitioner/Transferor Company
     WITH

ZF India Private Limited
                                      Non-Petitioner/Transferee Company

                                Through Mr. Abhishek Seth,    Advocate
                                for the petitioners
                                Ms.     Aparna     Mudiam,    Assistant
                                Registrar of Companies         for the
                                Regional Director
                                Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate        for the
                                Official Liquidator

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

1. This petition has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the

Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner/transferor company seeking

sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation of ZF Components Investment

Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner/transferor

company) with ZF India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the

transferee company).

2. The registered office of the petitioner/transferor company is

situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court. However, the

registered office of the transferee company is situated at Maharashtra,

outside the jurisdiction of this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner

submitted that a separate petition will be filed by the transferee company

in the court of competent jurisdiction for sanction of the Scheme of

Amalgamation in respect of the transferee company.

3. The petitioner/transferor company was originally incorporated

under the Companies Act, 1956 on 28th March, 2001 with the Registrar of

Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi under the name and

style of Sona Investment Limited. The company changed its name to

Sona Investment Private Limited and obtained the fresh certificate of

incorporation on 25th July, 2005. The company again changed its name

to ZF Components Investment Private Limited and obtained the fresh

certificate of incorporation on 23rd July, 2013.

4. The present authorized share capital of the petitioner/transferor

company is Rs.25,00,000/- divided into 1,50,000 Class 'A' equity shares

of Rs.10/- each aggregating to Rs.15,00,000/- and 1,00,000 Class 'B'

equity shares of Rs.10/- each aggregating to Rs.10,00,000/-. The present

issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is

Rs.7,36,500/- divided into 36,455 Class 'A' equity shares of Rs.10/- each

aggregating to Rs.3,64,550/- and 37,195 Class 'B' equity shares of

Rs.10/- each aggregating to Rs.3,71,950/-.

5. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the

petitioner/transferor company and the transferee company have been

filed on record with the application, being CA(M) 44/2015, earlier filed by

the petitioner. The audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2014, of

petitioner/transferor company and the transferee company, along with the

report of the auditors, had also been filed.

6. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record

and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and

detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is submitted by

the petitioner that the amalgamation will enable pooling of resources of

the companies to their common advantage resulting in more productive

utilization of the said resources, faster and effective decision making and

its implementation, cost and operational efficiencies, which would be

beneficial to all the stakeholders. It is further claimed that the

amalgamation would result in improving the net worth of the transferee

company enabling further growth and development of the business of the

transferee company.

7. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme

provides that the entire issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of

the petitioner/transferor company is held by the transferee company

along with its nominee. Therefore, no shares of the transferee company

shall be allotted in lieu or exchange of its holding in the transferor

company and the share capital of the transferor company shall stand

cancelled.

8. It has been submitted by the petitioner that no proceedings under

Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the

petitioner/transferor company.

9. The Board of Directors of the petitioner/transferor company and the

transferee company in their separate meetings held on 30th August, 2014

and 23rd May, 2014 respectively have unanimously approved the

proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the Resolutions passed at

the meetings of the Board of Directors of the petitioner/transferor

company and the transferee company have been placed on record.

10. The petitioner/transferor company had earlier filed CA (M) No.

44/2015 seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement

of convening the meetings of its equity shareholders, secured and

unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the

Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 29th April, 2015, this court

allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of convening

and holding the meeting of the equity shareholders of the

petitioner/transferor company, there being no secured or unsecured

creditor of the petitioner/transferor company, to consider and, if thought

fit, approve, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme of

Amalgamation.

11. The petitioner/transferor company has thereafter filed the present

petition seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order

dated 18th May, 2015, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to

the Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator.

Citations were also directed to be published in 'Indian Express' (English)

and 'Jansatta' (Hindi) editions. Affidavit of service has been filed by the

petitioner showing compliance regarding service on the Official Liquidator

and the Regional Director, Northern Region and also regarding

publication of citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 14th July, 2015.

Copies of the newspaper clippings containing the publications have been

filed along with the said affidavit.

12. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought

information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information

received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 28th July, 2015

wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint against the

proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party interested in

the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the transferor company

do not appear to have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the

interest of its members, creditors or public interest, as per second proviso

of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.

13. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A. K.

Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate

Affairs has filed his report dated 10th August, 2015. Relying on Clause 8.1

of the Scheme, he has stated that, upon sanction of the Scheme of

Amalgamation, all the employees of the transferor company shall

become the employees of the transferee company without any break or

interruption in their services. He has further submitted that in Clause 15.3

of the Scheme, it has been stated that upon the Scheme becoming

effective, the transferee company shall account for the amalgamation of

the transferor company as per the pooling of interest method of

accounting stipulated by Accounting Standard-14 Accounting for

Amalgamation as stated in the Companies (Accounting Standards)

Rules, 2006. He further submitted that in Clause 16.1 of the Scheme, it

has been stated that upon this scheme becoming effective, the transferor

company shall stand dissolved without the process of winding up.

14. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation

from any other party. The petitioner company in the affidavit dated 14th

August, 2015 of Mr. T.H. Gopalakrishnan, authorized signatory of the

petitioner/transferor company has submitted that neither the petitioner

company nor their counsel have received any objection pursuant to the

citations published in the newspapers on 14th July, 2015.

15. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders of

the petitioner company to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there

being no secured or unsecured creditors of the petitioner company, and

the affidavits filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region, and the

Official Liquidator not raising any objection to the proposed Scheme of

Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment to the grant of

sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently, subject to

sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation in respect of the transferee

company from the court of competent jurisdiction, sanction is hereby

granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of

the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner company will comply with the

statutory requirements in accordance with law. Certified copy of this order

be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days. It is also clarified

that this order will not be construed as an order granting exemption from

payment of stamp duty as payable in accordance with law. Upon the

sanction becoming effective from the appointed date of Amalgamation,

i.e. 1st April, 2014, the transferor company shall stand dissolved without

undergoing the process of winding up.

16. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs may

also be imposed keeping in view the fact that the matter has involved

examination of extensive records and prioritized hearings. He submits

that at least costs of Rs.1,00,000/- should be paid by the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the same is acceptable to

him. Looking to the circumstances, the petitioner shall deposit a sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- by way of costs in the Common Pool Fund of the Official

Liquidator, within two weeks.

17. The petition is allowed in the above terms.

Dasti.

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.

September 21, 2015

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter