Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 6930 Del
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2015
$~10
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 445/2012
NARESH KHETREPAL ..... Plaintiff
Through : None.
versus
PERSONAL POINT CARE LTD ..... Defendant
Through : None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 14.09.2015
1. On 4.9.2014, counsel for the plaintiff had stated that the case
had already been settled with the defendant and some instalments
had also been paid to his client. He had however sought an
adjournment to enable him to file an application in that regard.
However, no such application has been filed by the plaintiff.
2. The case was passed over on the first call as none was present
for the plaintiff. Same is the position even on the second call.
3. It appears that the plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the
present suit, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-
prosecution.
HIMA KOHLI, J SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 sk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!