Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gaurav Enterprises vs Regional Provident Fund ...
2015 Latest Caselaw 6768 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 6768 Del
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2015

Delhi High Court
Gaurav Enterprises vs Regional Provident Fund ... on 9 September, 2015
Author: Sunil Gaur
$~8

*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                Date of Decision: September 09, 2015

+     W.P.(C) 8669/2015

      GAURAV ENTERPRISES                              ..... Petitioner
                  Through:            Mr. Manish Malhotra, Advocate

                    versus

      REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
                                              ..... Respondent
                   Through: Mr. R.C. Chawla, Advocate

      CORAM:
      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

                         JUDGMENT

% (ORAL)

CM APPLN.18964/2015 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 8669/2015 & CM APPLN.18963/2015 (Stay) While entertaining petitioner's appeal under The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, Appellate Tribunal vide order of 9th July, 2015 (Annexure P-1) had directed petitioner to deposit 50% of the assessed amount as a pre-condition for hearing of the Appeal. Petitioner could not comply with the aforesaid order (Annexure P-1) and had sought rectification of the aforesaid order which stands dismissed by the learned Appellate Tribunal vide order of

W.P.(C) 8669/2015 Page 1 4th September, 2015 (Annexure P-3) holding that there is no mistake apparent on the record and the Tribunal is not empowered to recall order of 9th July, 2015.

At the hearing, learned counsel for petitioner submits that due to financial difficulty, petitioner could not comply with the aforesaid order (Annexure P-1) and now petitioner is in a position to comply with the order (Annexure P-1) and so, petitioner's appeal ought to be decided on merits.

Upon hearing and on perusal of the impugned orders and the material on record, I find that due to financial difficulty, petitioner could not comply with the order (Annexure P-1) and now petitioner is ready to comply with the order (Annexure P-1) within a period of four weeks from today. Therefore, the impugned order dismissing petitioner's appeal in default is set aside with permission to petitioner to deposit 50% of the assessed amount within a period of four weeks from today. Upon deposit of the 50% of the assessed amount, petitioner's appeal (Annexure P-4 colly.) be decided with expedition.

With aforesaid direction, this petition is disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for petitioner.


                                                         (SUNIL GAUR)
                                                            JUDGE
      SEPTEMBER 09, 2015
      s




W.P.(C) 8669/2015                                                     Page 2
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter