Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinnu Goel vs Assotech Ltd
2015 Latest Caselaw 6765 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 6765 Del
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2015

Delhi High Court
Vinnu Goel vs Assotech Ltd on 9 September, 2015
Author: J.R. Midha
*       IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                             ARB.P. 381/2015
%                                   Date of Decision: 09th September, 2015

        VINNU GOEL                                         ..... Petitioner
                           Through:      Mr. Nishant Das, Advocate

                           versus

        ASSOTECH LTD                                       ..... Respondent
                           Through:      Mr. Rakesh Sinha, Advocate

                                       AND
+       ARB.P. 382/2015

        VINNU GOEL                                         ..... Petitioner
                           Through:      Mr. Nishant Das, Advocate

                           versus

        ASSOTECH LTD                                       ..... Respondent
                           Through:      Mr. Rakesh Sinha, Advocate

        CORAM:
        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

                                JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner is seeking appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

2. There is valid arbitration agreements dated 9th November, 2011 and 15th November, 2011 between the parties, which provide for resolution of disputes by a named arbitrator. The disputes have arisen between the parties. Vide letter dated 7th April, 2015, the petitioner issued notice to the named arbitrator to enter upon reference. However, the named arbitrator

vide letter dated 18th May, 2015 has expressed his inability to enter upon reference due to health reasons. The petitioner, therefore, has approached this Court for appointment of an arbitrator.

3. Learned counsels for both the parties agree for appointment of a sole arbitrator by this Court. Learned counsels, however, submit that the arbitrator should enter upon reference after 120 days to enable the parties to make an endeavour to amicably resolve their disputes.

4. The petition is allowed and Justice Manju Goel (Retd.) is appointed as sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties including their claims and counter-claims.

5. The arbitration shall take place under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre ('DAC'). The fees of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DAC) (Administrative Cost Arbitrator's Fees) Rules.

6. The Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DAC) shall wait for a period of 120 days to enable the parties to resolve their disputes through mediation. In the event of failure of the parties to resolve their disputes within 120 days, DAC shall commence the arbitration proceedings.

7. Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the parties under the signature of the Court Master. A copy of this order be delivered to the learned Arbitrator as well as Additional Coordinator, DAC forthwith.

J.R. MIDHA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 09th , 2015 rsk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter