Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 6724 Del
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2015
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 2500/2009
NEERAJ YADAV ..... Plaintiff
Through : None.
versus
SUBHASH YADAV & ORS ..... Defendants
Through : None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 08.09.2015
1. The case was passed over on the first call as none was present
for the parties. Same is the position even on the second call.
2. On the last date of hearing, it was noted that the parties had
remained in a settlement mode for one and a half year. As none had
been appearing for the defendant after 6.2.2014, learned counsel for
the plaintiff was directed to give a written intimation of the next date
of hearing to the counsel for the defendants and place on record proof
of intimation. However, neither has the counsel for the plaintiff
presented himself today, nor has the proof of intimation of the next
date of hearing to the other side, been placed on record.
3. It appears that the plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the
present suit, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-
prosecution.
HIMA KOHLI, J SEPTEMBER 08, 2015/sk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!