Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 6597 Del
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2015
$~41.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 2977/2014 and I.A. 19032/2014
MEHKAR VATI & ANOTHER ..... Plaintiffs
Through: None
versus
PRAKASH CHANDRA YADAV ..... Defendant
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
ORDER
% 03.09.2015
1. A perusal of the order sheets shows that on 13.07.2015, counsel
for the plaintiffs had stated before the Joint Registrar that he wished
to withdraw the suit and it was on account of the said statement that
the case was directed to be placed before the Court.
2. The case was passed over on the first call as none was present
on behalf of the plaintiffs. Same is the position on the second call.
3. It appears from the aforesaid order that the plaintiffs are not
interested in prosecuting the present suit. As none is present on
behalf of the plaintiffs today, the suit is dismissed in default and for
non-prosecution alongwith the pending application.
HIMA KOHLI, J SEPTEMBER 03, 2015 rkb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!