Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri Vijay Dua vs State & Ors.
2015 Latest Caselaw 7951 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 7951 Del
Judgement Date : 15 October, 2015

Delhi High Court
Shri Vijay Dua vs State & Ors. on 15 October, 2015
Author: Valmiki J. Mehta
*             IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                         TEST. CAS. No. 23/2010
%                                                        15th October, 2015

SHRI VIJAY DUA                                              ..... Petitioner

                          Through:       Mr. Amit Saxena, Mr. Anil Saxena
                                         and Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocates.


                          Versus

STATE & ORS.                                                ..... Respondents

                          Through:       Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for R-2
                                         and 2.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?


VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1.            This probate petition has been filed by Sh. Vijay Dua son of

late Sh. Narsingh Dass Dua seeking probate of the Will dated 29.11.2004

executed by the father Sh. Narsingh Dass Dua. At the outset, I may note that

the petition though is titled as a petition seeking probate, really the petition

will be for letters of administration with the Will annexed, inasmuch as, in

the Will of Sh. Narsingh Dass Dua dated 29.11.2004 there is no executor

appointed and probate can only be granted to the executor in terms of

TEST. CAS. No. 23/2010                                                          Page 1 of 5
 Section 222 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. This petition is therefore

treated as a petition for letters of administration with the Will annexed.


2.            Respondents no.2 and 3 in this petition are the other son and the

daughter of late Sh. Narsingh Dass Dua. These respondents had filed their

written statements originally conceding to the probate petition. However,

these two respondents thereafter sought to back out, and wanting to amend

their written statements to dispute the Will, but such endeavour was

disallowed by dismissing an application for amendment of these

respondents, by the Order of a learned Single of this Court dated 25.5.2012.

Appeal filed by the respondents no.2 and 3 to the Order dated 25.5.2012 of a

learned Single Judge was dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court on

3.9.2012 in FAO(OS) No. 425/2012 and the SLP filed in the Supreme Court

was also dismissed.


3.            Petitioner has appeared in the witness box as PW1 and evidence

has also been led by the petitioner of one attesting witness to the Will

namely Sh. Vikram Bali as PW2.


4.            A reading of the affidavit by way of evidence filed on behalf of

the attesting witness Sh. Vikram Bali PW2 shows that the deceased Sh.

Narsingh Dass Dua had got the Will prepared in his presence and had signed
TEST. CAS. No. 23/2010                                                       Page 2 of 5
 the same after reading the same. Late Sh. Narsingh Dass Dua is stated to

have signed the Will in the presence of both the attesting witnesses and both

the attesting witnesses also signed in the presence of late Sh. Narsingh Dass

Dua. The Will was registered before the Sub-Registrar on the same date

when the attesting witnesses were present. The following portion of the

affidavit by way of evidence of the attesting witness Sh. Vikram Bali shows

that the Will has been proved and these paras read as under:-

       "3.    I also state that on 28th November, 2004, the deceased visited my
              house and requested me to accompany him to the office of Sub
              Registrar-IV, Seelampur, Delhi the next day, and on my query, he
              informed that he wanted to execute a Will in respect of all his
              assets/properties both movable and immovable. I assured the
              deceased that he would be there in the office of Sub Registrar-IV,
              Delhi, on 29.11.2004 sharp at 10 A.M. and accordingly on
              29.11.2004, the deceased in my presence got prepared the Will
              and after getting the same typed, read over the same and finding
              the same strictly as per his desire and instructions, the deceased
              signed and appended his thumb impression on both the pages of
              the said Will in my presence as well as in presence of Mr. Ajay
              Kumar, Advocate.
       4.     I also state that the deceased had executed and signed the said
              Will in my presence as well as in presence of Shri Ajay Kumar,
              Advocate, and thereafter I affixed my hands unto the said
              document at the place mark A and subsequently Mr. Ajay Kumar
              also affixed his seal and signature on the said document as
              attesting witnesses.
       5.     I also state that the deceased, myself, and the other witness Mr.
              Ajay Kumar, Advocate signed the said document in presence of
              each other, present at the same date, place and time. I identify the
              signatures of the deceased Shri Narsingh Dass Dua on the said
              document.

TEST. CAS. No. 23/2010                                                         Page 3 of 5
        6.     I also state that the said Will/Document dated 29.11.2004 was
              presented for registration with the office of Sub Registrar, Delhi
              and the deceased as well as myself and other witness appeared
              before the Sub Registrar concerned on 29.11.2004 and the said
              document was registered as document No.20110 in Addl. Book
              No.3, Volume No. 2346 on pages 103 to 104 on 29.11.04."

5.            In the cross-examination of this attesting witness nothing has

been elicited that the Will was not signed by late Sh. Narsingh Dass Dua or

that it was not signed by him in the presence of the witnesses or that the

witnesses did not sign in the presence of late Sh. Narsingh Dass Dua. This

witness had denied the suggestion that the deceased was not in a sound

mental health when he executed the Will.


6.            Even in the cross-examination of the petitioner as PW1 nothing

has been elicited for setting aside of the Will and PW1 has specifically

denied the suggestions that the Will was not executed by late Sh. Narsingh

Dass Dua or the same was not signed by him in the presence of the witnesses

or that the witnesses did not sign in the presence of Sh. Narsingh Dass Dua.


7.            In my opinion, in view of the above, petitioner is successful in

proving the Will dated 29.11.2004 of late Sh. Narsingh Dass Dua and which

is Ex.PW2/1. Petitioner is therefore granted letters of administration with

the Will dated 29.11.2004 annexed of late Sh. Narsingh Dass Dua.

TEST. CAS. No. 23/2010                                                       Page 4 of 5
 8.            Since petitioner is the sole beneficiary under the Will, there will

be no requirement of petitioner having to give any administration bond or

surety bond. Petitioner will however have to pay the court fees necessary for

granting of letters of administration with the Will annexed.


9.            This petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly, leaving

the parties to bear their own costs.




OCTOBER 15, 2015                                    VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

ib

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter