Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abhishek Sharma & Ors vs The State & Anr
2015 Latest Caselaw 8874 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 8874 Del
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2015

Delhi High Court
Abhishek Sharma & Ors vs The State & Anr on 30 November, 2015
#46
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                 Date of decision: 30.11.2015

W.P.(CRL) 2740/2015

ABHISHEK SHARMA & ORS                               ..... Petitioners
                Through:                Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate

                           versus

THE STATE & ANR                                      ..... Respondents

Through: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC (Criminal) for R-1 Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advocate for R-

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)

CRL.M.A.17412/2015 (Exemption)

Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

W.P.(CRL) 2740/2015

1. The present is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.)

seeking quashing of FIR No.161/2015, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC,

registered at Police Station- Geeta Colony, Delhi and the proceedings arising

therefrom.

2. The facts in brief are that on 23.10.2015 the petitioner No.1 married

respondent No.2 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies in Delhi. One

female child, namely, baby Sonakshi was born out of the said wedlock on

09.12.2013 who is in the care and custody of petitioner No.1 (husband) and

the respondent No.2 (wife). Due to ideological differences and

misunderstandings the respondent No.2 (wife) filed a complaint which has

fructified into the subject FIR. The petitioner No.1 (husband) and the

respondent No.2 (wife) were referred to the Mediation Centre, Karkardoma

Courts, Delhi, Delhi by the Sessions Court. With the aid and assistance of

the Mediation Centre, the parties have arrived at an amicable resolution of

their matrimonial dispute, inter alia, on the following terms and conditions:-

"1. It has been settled between the parties (i.e.

petitioner/wife and respondent/husband) that they shall live together as husband and wife along with their child namely Sonakshi in a rented house in Delhi on or before 07.09.2015.

2. It is agreed between the parties that the respondent/husband shall bear and maintain the petitioner/wife and the child and also responsible for the whole household

expenses like medical, rationing, education etc.

3. It is agreed between the parties that the petitioner/wife shall do the household work and shall perform the matrimonial obligations.

4. It has been settled between the parties that both the parties shall try to harmonize their relationship and respect feelings of each other and shall not give any chance of complaint to each other and shall also not use any kind of abusive language/negative remarks against each other.

5. It has been further agreed between the parties that family members/relatives of both the parties shall not interfere in the peaceful matrimonial life the parties.

6. It has been agreed between the parties that the petitioner/wife and the respondent/husband shall withdraw their respective cases from the court concerned, within four months from today, on being satisfactory living together of the parties.

7. It has been further agreed between the parties that the respondent/husband shall move appropriate petition before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi for quashing of present FIR No.161/15, U/s 498A/406/34 IPC, PS- Geeta Colony after six months from joining of the parties together, on being satisfaction living together of the parties. Further, the petitioner/wife shall cooperate to get the FIR quashed before the Hon'ble High Court.

8. It is agreed between the parties that besides the above said matter, no other case is pending litigation between them. However, in case any other case/litigation shall be found pending between the parties, the same shall be withdrawn by the respective parties in the light of present settlement.

9. It has been settled between the parties that this settlement is arrived at between the parties voluntarily, without there being any pressure, coercion or threat or undue influence of any kind and they are signing the same after understanding the contents of the same in their vernacular language.

10. It is agreed between the parties that they shall remain bound by the aforesaid terms of settlement."

3. Petitioner No.1 Abhishek Sharma (husband) and respondent No.2

Dimple Bhatia alias Bhoomika Sharma (wife) who are present in person in

Court today and have been identified by their respective counsel. The

respondent No.2 (wife) states in view of the settlement dated 07.08.2015

arrived at between the parties she is living together with the petitioner No.1

(husband) since 08.11.2015 and is no longer keen to proceed with the subject

FIR and the proceedings arising therefrom.

4. In the circumstances, since no useful purpose will be served by

proceeding with the subject FIR on account of the parties having settled their

disputes finally, the subject FIR No.161/2015, under Sections 498A/406/34

IPC, registered at Police Station- Geeta Colony, Delhi and the proceedings

arising therefrom are hereby set aside and quashed qua all the petitioners.

5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J

NOVEMBER 30, 2015 dn

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter