Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Azad vs State (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi)
2015 Latest Caselaw 8362 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 8362 Del
Judgement Date : 4 November, 2015

Delhi High Court
Azad vs State (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi) on 4 November, 2015
#23
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                                Date of decision: 04.11.2015

BAIL APPLN. 2405/2015

AZAD                                                 ..... Petitioner

                          Through:     Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate

                          versus

STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)                         ..... Respondent

Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP with SI Manohar Lal, PS- Rajouri Garden, Delhi

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)

CRL.M.A.16206/2015 (Exemption)

Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

BAIL APPLN. 2405/2015

1. The present is an application under section 439 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) praying for regular bail in FIR

No.1402/2015, under sections 147/148/149/186/353/332/307/435/427 IPC

read with section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984,

registered at Police Station- Rajouri Garden, Delhi.

2. The applicant has been in judicial custody since the night intervening

21.09.2015 and 22.09.2015.

3. Mr. Anurag Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant

states that although the applicant has been named in the subject FIR, he has

been falsely implicated. Mr. Jain would then urge that on 21.09.2015, the

date when the alleged incident occurred, he was attending to his ailing

mother at Khetarpal Hospital, Main Najafgarh Road, Delhi all day long. In

this behalf, Mr. Jain learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant has

invited my attention to the CCTV grabs annexed to the present application

and marked as Annexure - 'B' at page 45, which according to him clearly

establish the applicant's presence at the Khetarpal Hospital.

4. The case of the prosecution is that the applicant was part of a mob

which committed the subject offences within the jurisdiction of Police

Station- Rajouri Garden, Delhi between 21.30 hours on 21.09.2015 and

00.15 hours on the following day. Ms. Radhika Kolluru, learned APP would

urge that the applicant was apprehended at the spot at 11.30 p.m. on the same

night.

5. In the present case, it is observed that on 21.09.2015 at about 04.30

p.m., the dead bodies of three victims of a triple murder were handed over to

their relatives after conducting post mortem by the DDU Hospital, Hari

Nagar, Delhi. It is noticed that the bodies of the said three victims were

taken in a Janaja Namaz by their relatives to a Mosque within the

jurisdiction of Police Station- Rajouri Garden, Delhi. The residents of the

area were stated to be infuriated at the inaction of the official respondents. It

is alleged that an agitated mob of 1500 people started shouting slogans

against the police and indulged in large scale arson and stone pelting.

However, none of the police personnel present at the site was seriously

injured. It is also an admitted position that the CCTV footage for 21.09.2015

establishes the presence of the applicant at the Khetarpal Hospital till late in

the evening on the day of the incident.

6. The applicant has been in judicial custody since 22.09.2015. Charge

sheet has not yet been filed by the police in the subject FIR and is stated to

be under consideration.

7. In view of the aforesaid, in my view, the applicant is entitled to be

released on regular bail.

8. Ordered accordingly.

9. The applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal

bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court subject to the

conditions that:-

(i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her to disclose such facts to the Court or to any other authority;

(ii) The applicant shall not try and influence witnesses or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on all the dates fixed for hearing by that Court.

10. With the above directions, the present application is allowed and

disposed of accordingly.

11. Dasti.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J

NOVEMBER 04, 2015 dn

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter