Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 4170 Del
Judgement Date : 25 May, 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
COMPANY PETITION NO. 608/2014
Reserved on 19th May, 2015
Date of pronouncement: 25th May, 2015
In the matter of
The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent
applicable):
And
Petition under Sections 391(1), 393 & 394 of
the Companies Act, 1956
Scheme of Amalgamation of:
GL Software Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 1
IP Unity Communications Limited
Petitioner/Transferor Company No. 2
WITH
GlobalLogic India Limited
Petitioner/Transferee Company
Through Mr. Shankh Sengupta and
Ms.Srishti Jain, Advocates for the
petitioners
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
1. This joint petition has been filed under Sections 391(1), 393 & 394
of the Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioner companies seeking
sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation of GL Software Limited
(hereinafter referred to as the transferor company no. 1) and IP Unity
Communications Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor
company no. 2) with GlobalLogic India Limited (hereinafter referred to as
the transferee company).
2. The registered offices of the transferor and transferee companies
are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this court.
3. The transferor company no. 1 was originally incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 3rd September, 2003 with the Registrar of
Companies, Karnataka at Bangalore under the name and style of
Sylantro Software India Private Limited. The company changed its name
to GL Software Private Limited and obtained the fresh certificate of
incorporation on 21st January, 2010. Thereafter, the company shifted its
registered office from the State of Karnataka to Delhi and obtained a
certificate in this regard from the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi &
Haryana at New Delhi on 9th September, 2013. The company again
changed its name to GL Software Limited and obtained the fresh
certificate of incorporation on 22nd November, 2013.
4. The transferor company no. 2 was originally incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 12th July, 2004 with the Registrar of Companies,
Karnataka at Bangalore under the name and style of IP Unity
Communications Private Limited. Thereafter, the company shifted its
registered office from the State of Karnataka to Delhi and obtained a
certificate in this regard from the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi &
Haryana at New Delhi on 4th September, 2013. The company again
changed its name to IP Unity Communications Limited and obtained the
fresh certificate of incorporation on 22nd November, 2013.
5. The transferee company was originally incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 on 27th December, 2000 with the Registrar of
Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana at New Delhi under the name and
style of EBProvider India Private Limited. The company changed its
name to IndusLogic India Private Limited and obtained the fresh
certificate of incorporation on 7th May, 2003. The company again
changed its name to GlobalLogic India Private Limited and obtained the
fresh certificate of incorporation on 3rd October, 2006. The company
finally changed its name to GlobalLogic India Limited and obtained the
fresh certificate of incorporation on 22nd November, 2013.
6. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.1 is Rs.50,00,000/- divided into 5,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/-
each. The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company
is Rs.23,58,550/- divided into 2,35,855 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
7. The present authorized share capital of the transferor company
no.2 is Rs.5,00,000/- divided into 50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is
Rs.5,00,000/- divided into 50,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
8. The present authorized share capital of the transferee company is
Rs.1,50,00,000/- divided into 15,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
The issued, subscribed and paid-up share capital of the company is
Rs.17,46,170/- divided into 1,74,617 equity shares of Rs.10/- each.
9. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the
transferor and transferee companies have been filed on record with the
joint application, being CA(M) 130/2014, earlier filed by the petitioners.
The audited balance sheets, as on 31st March, 2013, of the transferor
and transferee companies, along with the report of the auditors, had also
been filed.
10. A copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation has been placed on record
and the salient features of the Scheme have been incorporated and
detailed in the petition and the accompanying affidavit. It is claimed that
by the proposed amalgamation benefit of consolidation of financial
resources, managerial, technical and marketing expertise of the
transferor companies and the transferee company shall be available to
the amalgamated entity. It is further claimed that the proposed
amalgamation would result in enhanced potential for increase in
revenues and profits for the amalgamated entity and its shareholders.
11. So far as the share exchange ratio is concerned, the Scheme
provides that, upon coming into effect of this Scheme, the transferee
company shall issue and allot equity shares to the shareholders of the
transferor companies in the following ratio:
"01 equity share of Rs.10/- each of the transferee company fully paid up for every 93 equity shares of Rs.10/- each held in the transferor company no. 1."
"01 equity share of Rs.10/- each of the transferee company fully paid up for every 03 equity shares of Rs.10/- each held in the transferor company no. 2."
12. It has been submitted by the petitioners that no proceedings under
Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the
transferor and transferee companies.
13. The Board of Directors of the transferor and transferee companies
in their separate meetings held on 1st August, 2014 have unanimously
approved the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation. Copies of the
Resolutions passed at the meetings of the Board of Directors of the
transferor and transferee companies have been placed on record.
14. The petitioner companies had earlier filed CA (M) No. 130/2014
seeking directions of this court to dispense with the requirement of
convening the meetings of their equity shareholders, secured and
unsecured creditors, which are statutorily required for sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 17th September, 2014, this
court allowed the application and dispensed with the requirement of
convening and holding the meetings of the equity shareholders of the
transferor and transferee companies, there being no secured or
unsecured creditors of the petitioner companies, to consider and, if
thought fit, approve, with or without modification, the proposed Scheme
of Amalgamation.
15. The petitioner companies have thereafter filed the present petition
seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation. Vide order dated 1st
October, 2014, notice in the petition was directed to be issued to the
Regional Director, Northern Region, and the Official Liquidator. Citations
were also directed to be published in 'Business Standard' (English) and
(Hindi) editions. Affidavit of service has been filed by the petitioners
showing compliance regarding service on the Official Liquidator and the
Regional Director, Northern Region and also regarding publication of
citations in the aforesaid newspapers on 30th October, 2014. Copies of
the newspaper clippings containing the publications have been filed
along with the said affidavit.
16. Pursuant to the notices issued, the Official Liquidator sought
information from the petitioner companies. Based on the information
received, the Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 8th December,
2014 wherein he has stated that he has not received any complaint
against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party
interested in the Scheme in any manner and that the affairs of the
transferor companies do not appear to have been conducted in a manner
prejudicial to the interest of their members, creditors or public interest, as
per second proviso of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
17. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. A.K.
Chaturvedi, Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of Corporate
Affairs has filed his report dated 5th December, 2014. Relying on Clause
5 of Part-III of the Scheme, he has stated that, upon sanction of the
Scheme of Amalgamation, all the employees of the transferor companies
shall become the employees of the transferee company without any
break or interruption in their services. He has further submitted that in
Clause 9 of Part-III of the Scheme, it has been stated that the transferee
company shall account for the amalgamation in its books as per „pooling
of interest method‟ prescribed under the provisions of Accounting
Standard-14, issued by Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. He
further submitted that in Clause 11 of Part-III of the Scheme, it has been
stated that upon this scheme becoming effective, the transferor company
nos. 1 & 2 shall stand dissolved without the process of winding up.
18. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation
from any other party. The petitioner companies, in the affidavit dated 22nd
April, 2015 of Mr. Ranji Srivastava, authorized signatory of the petitioner
companies, have submitted that neither the petitioner companies nor
their counsel have received any objection pursuant to the citations
published in the newspapers on 30th October, 2014.
19. Considering the approval accorded by the equity shareholders of
the petitioner companies to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation and
the affidavits filed by the Regional Director, Northern Region, and the
Official Liquidator not raising any objection to the proposed Scheme of
Amalgamation, there appears to be no impediment to the grant of
sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. Consequently, sanction is
hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and
394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner companies will comply
with the statutory requirements in accordance with law. Certified copy of
this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days. It is
also clarified that this order will not be construed as an order granting
exemption from payment of stamp duty as payable in accordance with
law. Upon the sanction becoming effective from the appointed date of
Amalgamation, i.e. 1st April, 2014, the transferor companies no. 1 & 2
shall stand dissolved without undergoing the process of winding up.
20. Learned counsel for the Official Liquidator prays that costs of at
least Rs.3.0 lakhs should be paid by the petitioners keeping in view the
fact that the matter has involved examination of extensive records and
also prioritized hearings. Learned counsel for the petitioner companies
states that the same is acceptable to him. Looking to the circumstances,
the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.3.0 lakhs by way of costs with the
Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator within two weeks.
21. The petition is allowed in the above terms.
Dasti.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
May 25, 2015
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!