Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Cit vs M/S Cushman And Wakefield India ...
2015 Latest Caselaw 3734 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 3734 Del
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2015

Delhi High Court
Cit vs M/S Cushman And Wakefield India ... on 7 May, 2015
$~9
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%                                                DECIDED ON: 07.05.2015

+                                  ITA 87/2015
       CIT                                                     ..... Appellant
                          Through: Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel
                          with Mr. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel.

                          versus

       M/S CUSHMAN AND WAKEFIELD INDIA PVT LTD
                                                     ..... Respondent

Through: Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gajendra Maheshwari, Mr. Sumit Batra and Ms. Swati Thapa, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J. (OPEN COURT)

1. Whilst issuing notice on 18.02.2015, the Court had followed its previous decision in ITA 475/2012 decided on 23.5.2014) which is in respect of the same assessee, and answered the first question in favour of the Revenue. The surviving question pertains to deletion of `3,40,96,056/- i.e., the Referral Fee paid to the group entity by the assessee. On that date itself the Court had noticed that this question was identical with the surviving question in ITA 475/2012.

2. This Court has today dismissed the said surviving question in ITA 475/2012 urged by the Revenue and held that the similar amount

ITA 87/2015 Page 1 could not have been disallowed. Consequently, following the reasoning in that judgment (ITA 475/2012), the question urged in the present case too is answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.

3. The Court had on 18.02.2015 also noticed that the issue pertaining to Section 43B had been remitted to the AO and consequently not framed the question of law.

4. The appeal to the extent of the question framed, i.e., with respect to the disallowance under Section 37 fails and is dismissed.




                                                   S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J



                                                             R.K.GAUBA, J
       MAY 07, 2015
       /vikas/




ITA 87/2015                                                              Page 2
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter