Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ravinder Mohan vs Neeraj Singla & Ors
2015 Latest Caselaw 3618 Del

Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 3618 Del
Judgement Date : 5 May, 2015

Delhi High Court
Ravinder Mohan vs Neeraj Singla & Ors on 5 May, 2015
16 $~
*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+           CS(OS) 832/2012 & IA No.5875/2015.

                                                 Decided on 05.05.2015
IN THE MATTER OF:
RAVINDER MOHAN                                      ..... Plaintiff
                        Through : Mr. Shekhar Dasi, Advocate with
                        plaintiff in person.

                        versus
NEERAJ SINGLA & ORS                                  ..... Defendants
                        Through : Ms. Meera Mathur, Advocate
                        for D-1 & 2 with D-1 in person.
                        None for D-3 & D-4
CORAM
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

HIMA KOHLI, J. (Oral)

1. The present suit has been instituted by the plaintiff against the

defendants No.1, 3 & 4, who are siblings, and the defendant No.2,

mother of the parties, praying inter alia for partitioning the Flat

No.147-B (MIG) SFS) Pocket-B, Mayur Vihar Phase-II, Delhi, an

immovable property owned by Shri Madan Mohan Singh (father of the

plaintiff and the defendants No.1, 3 & 4 and husband of the defendant

No.2). After completion of pleadings, the suit is at the stage of

framing of issues.

2. Counsels for the parties state that the defendants No.3 & 4 have

filed their written statements stating inter alia that they are not laying

any claim to a share in the suit premises. They have gone on to state

that though the suit premises was purchased in the name of their

father, it is the defendant No.1 who had funded the purchase of the

property and the said fact was accepted by all the members of the

family. In other words, the defendants No.3 & 4 do not lay any claim

to a share in the suit premises. This leaves the plaintiff and the

defendants No.1 & 2.

3. On the last date of hearing, having regard to the nature of

dispute between the parties, it had been inquired from the counsels for

the parties if they would be willing to submit themselves to mediation.

4. Today, counsels for the parties state, on instructions, that they

have arrived at a settlement, in terms whereof the defendants No.1 &

2 have agreed to pay a sum of `27.00 lacs to the plaintiff towards his

1/5th undivided share in the suit premises, which offer has been duly

accepted by the plaintiff. As for the modality of making the said

payment, it has been agreed by the parties that the defendants No.1 &

2 shall pay a sum of `7.00 lacs to the plaintiff towards the first

instalment on or before 31.5.2015 and the remaining amount of

`20.00 lacs shall be paid in the following manner :

(a) Second instalment of `7.00 lacs shall be paid by the

defendants No.1 & 2 to the plaintiff on or before

30.6.2015.

(b) Third instalment of `7.00 lacs shall be paid by the

defendants No.1 & 2 to the plaintiff on or before 31.7.2015

and

(c) the last and final instalment of `6.00 lacs shall be paid by

the defendants No.1 & 2 to the plaintiff on or before

31.8.2015.

5. The parties have agreed that in case the defendants No.1 & 2

commit any default in making the aforesaid payment to the plaintiff on

or before the dates recorded hereinabove, they shall pay the plaintiff

interest @12% p.a. for the period of default and in case of two

consecutive defaults, the amount already paid shall be forfeited and

the plaintiff shall be entitled to seek revival of the suit.

6. It is further agreed that in view of the settlement arrived at

between the parties and recorded hereinabove, after receiving the

entire agreed amount of `27.00 lacs, the plaintiff would not be left

with any right, title or interest in the suit premises and he shall file an

affidavit in confirmation of the aforesaid settlement. Further, the

parties shall affix their signatures on the today's order sheet in

acknowledgment of the settlement.

7. Counsels for the parties state that in view of the aforesaid

comprehensive settlement arrived at between the parties, nothing

further survives for adjudication in the suit which may be decreed by

declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to 1/5th undivided share in the

suit property and his share has been valued at `27.00 lacs, which

defendants No.1 & 2 have agreed to pay in the manner noted above.

8. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, the present suit is

decreed by declaring that the plaintiff is entitled to 1/5th undivided

share in the suit premises and towards his 1/5th undivided share, he

has accepted a sum of `27.00 lacs in full and final settlement and after

receiving the said amount, the plaintiff would not be left with any

right, title or interest in the suit premises. An affidavit on the said

lines shall be filed by the plaintiff within four weeks from today.

9. The suit is accordingly decreed, while leaving the parties to bear

their own costs.

10. The suit is disposed of, along with the pending application.




                                                       (HIMA KOHLI)
MAY 05, 2015                                              JUDGE
sk





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter